A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:65
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Total Pelvic Exenteration Combined With Sacral Resection for Rectal Cancer [J].
Komori, Koji ;
Tsukushi, Satoshi ;
Yoshida, Masahiro ;
Kinoshita, Takashi ;
Sato, Yusuke ;
Ouchi, Akira ;
Ito, Seiji ;
Abe, Tetsuya ;
Misawa, Kazunari ;
Ito, Yuichi ;
Natsume, Seiji ;
Higaki, Eiji ;
Asano, Tomonari ;
Okuno, Masataka ;
Fujieda, Hironori ;
Oki, Satoshi ;
Aritake, Tsukasa ;
Tawada, Kakeru ;
Akaza, Satoru ;
Saito, Hisahumi ;
Narita, Kiyoshi ;
Hiroki, Kawabata ;
Yasui, Kohei ;
Shimizu, Yasuhiro .
AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (11) :4578-4583
[32]   Factors Associated With Oncologic Outcomes After Abdominoperineal Resection Compared With Restorative Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Patient- and Tumor-Related or Technical Factors Only? [J].
Reshef, Avraham ;
Lavery, Ian ;
Kiran, Ravi P. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2012, 55 (01) :51-58
[33]   Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Wille-Jorgensen, Peer ;
Pilsgaard, Bo ;
Moller, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (03) :323-325
[34]   Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Zhang, Xubing ;
Wu, Qingbin ;
Hu, Tao ;
Gu, Chaoyang ;
Bi, Liang ;
Wang, Ziqiang .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (05) :526-539
[35]   Narrow Distal Resection Margin may be Sufficient for Rectal Cancer after Chemoradiation [J].
Park, Jun Ho ;
Kim, Hee Cheol ;
Cho, Yong Kwon ;
Yun, Hae-Ran ;
Cho, Yong Beom ;
Yun, Seong Hyeon ;
Lee, Woo Yong ;
Chun, Ho-Kyung .
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 58 (107) :769-774
[36]   Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review [J].
Akagi, Yoshito ;
Kinugasa, Tetsushi ;
Shirouzu, Kazuo .
SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (08) :838-847
[37]   Patients With Low Rectal Cancer Treated by Abdominoperineal Excision Have Worse Tumors and Higher Involved Margin Rates Compared With Patients Treated by Anterior Resection [J].
Shihab, Oliver C. ;
Brown, Gina ;
Daniels, Ian R. ;
Heald, Richard J. ;
Quirke, Philip ;
Moran, Brendan J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (01) :53-56
[38]   Perineal Repair After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer [J].
Christensen, Henrik Kidmose ;
Nerstrom, Peter ;
Tei, Troels ;
Laurberg, Soren .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (06) :711-717
[39]   A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer [J].
Cornish, Julie A. ;
Tilney, Henry S. ;
Heriot, Alexander G. ;
Lavery, Ian C. ;
Fazio, Victor W. ;
Tekkis, Paris P. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) :2056-2068
[40]   The effect of postoperative pelvic irradiation after complete resection of metastatic rectal cancer [J].
Chang, Chul Young ;
Kim, Hee Cheol ;
Park, Young Suk ;
Park, Joon Oh ;
Choi, Doo Ho ;
Park, Hee Chul ;
Cho, Yong Beom ;
Yun, Seong Hyeon ;
Lee, Woo Yong ;
Chun, Ho-Kyung .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 105 (03) :244-248