A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:65
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Patient-reported outcomes after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: A systematic review [J].
Denys, Andreas ;
van Nieuwenhove, Yves ;
Van de Putte, Dirk ;
Pape, Eva ;
Pattyn, Piet ;
Ceelen, Wim ;
van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (04) :353-368
[22]   Oncological outcomes before and after the extralevator abdominoperineal excision era in rectal cancer patients treated with abdominoperineal excision in a single centre, high volume unit [J].
Lehtonen, T. ;
Rasanen, M. ;
Carpelan-Holmstrom, M. ;
Lepisto, A. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (02) :183-190
[23]   Extralevator vs conventional abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Negoi, Ionut ;
Hostiuc, Sorin ;
Paun, Sorin ;
Negoi, Ruxandra I. ;
Beuran, Mircea .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 212 (03) :511-526
[24]   Rise and fall of total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,366 patients [J].
Anania, Gabriele ;
Davies, Richard Justin ;
Arezzo, Alberto ;
Bagolini, Francesco ;
D'Andrea, Vito ;
Graziosi, Luigina ;
Salomone, Di Saverio ;
Popivanov, Georgi ;
Cheruiyot, Isaac ;
Cirocchi, Roberto ;
Donini, Annibale .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (11) :2321-2333
[25]   Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer [J].
Mirza, Muhammad Bilal ;
Gamboa, Adriana C. ;
Irlmeier, Rebecca ;
Hopkins, Benjamin ;
Regenbogen, Scott E. ;
Hrebinko, Katherine A. ;
Holder-Murray, Jennifer ;
Wiseman, Jason T. ;
Ejaz, Aslam ;
Wise, Paul E. ;
Ye, Fei ;
Idrees, Kamran ;
Hawkins, Alexander T. ;
Balch, Glen C. ;
Khan, Aimal .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 300 :494-502
[26]   The adequacy of the distal resection margin after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer [J].
Kim, T. G. ;
Park, W. ;
Choi, D. H. ;
Kim, S. -H. ;
Kim, H. C. ;
Lee, W. Y. ;
Park, J. O. ;
Park, Y. S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (08) :O257-O263
[27]   A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer [J].
Krishna, A. ;
Rickard, M. J. F. X. ;
Keshava, A. ;
Dent, O. F. ;
Chapuis, P. H. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (01) :57-65
[28]   Treatment outcomes of patients with involved resection margin after rectal cancer surgery: A nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea [J].
Bong, Jun Woo ;
Lee, Jung Ae ;
Ju, Yeonuk ;
Seo, Jihyun ;
Kang, Sang Hee ;
Lee, Sun Il ;
Min, Byung Wook .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (04) :378-387
[29]   Abdominoperineal Resection Provides Better Local Control But Equivalent Overall Survival to Local Excision of Anorectal Malignant Melanoma A Systematic Review [J].
Matsuda, Akihisa ;
Miyashita, Masao ;
Matsumoto, Satoshi ;
Takahashi, Goro ;
Matsutani, Takeshi ;
Yamada, Takeshi ;
Kishi, Taro ;
Uchida, Eiji .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (04) :670-677
[30]   Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Peer Wille-Jørgensen ;
Bo Pilsgaard ;
Peter Møller .
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 :323-325