A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:65
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[41]   Predictive factors of positive circumferential resection margin after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: The French randomised trial ACCORD12/0405 PRODIGE 2 [J].
Rullier, Anne ;
Gourgou-Bourgade, Sophie ;
Jarlier, Marta ;
Bibeau, Frederic ;
Chassagne-Clement, Catherine ;
Hennequin, Christophe ;
Tisseau, Laurent ;
Leroux, Agnes ;
Ettore, Francette ;
Peoc'h, Michel ;
Diebold, Marie-Agnes ;
Robin, Yves-Marie ;
Kleinclaus, Isabelle ;
Mineur, Laurent ;
Petitjean, Christophe ;
Mosnier, Jean-Francois ;
Soubeyran, Isabelle ;
Padilla, Norbert ;
Lemaistre, Anne-Isabelle ;
Berille, Jocelyne ;
Denis, Bernard ;
Conroy, Thierry ;
Gerard, Jean-Pierre .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (01) :82-89
[42]   Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum [J].
Rullier, E ;
Goffre, B ;
Bonnel, C ;
Zerbib, F ;
Caudry, M ;
Saric, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (05) :633-640
[43]   Sites of surgical waisting in the abdominoperineal specimen [J].
Salerno, G. ;
Chandler, I. ;
Wotherspoon, A. ;
Thomas, K. ;
Moran, B. ;
Brown, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (09) :1147-1154
[44]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prediction of an Involved Surgical Resection Margin in Low Rectal Cancer [J].
Salerno, Gisella V. ;
Daniels, Ian R. ;
Moran, Brendan J. ;
Heald, R. J. ;
Thomas, Karen ;
Brown, Gina .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (04) :632-639
[45]   Evaluation of a protocol-based management of rectal cancer [J].
Sasapu, Kishore K. ;
Sebag-Montefiore, David ;
Chalmers, Alan G. ;
Sagar, Peter M. ;
Burke, Dermot ;
Finan, Paul J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (11) :1703-1709
[46]   Can a Novel MRI Staging System for Low Rectal Cancer Aid Surgical Planning? [J].
Shihab, Oliver C. ;
How, Peter ;
West, Nicolas ;
George, Chris ;
Patel, Uday ;
Quirke, Philip ;
Heald, Richard J. ;
Moran, Brendan J. ;
Brown, Gina .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (10) :1260-1264
[47]   Optimal preoperative assessment and surgery for rectal cancer may greatly limit the need for radiotherapy [J].
Simunovic, M ;
Sexton, R ;
Rempel, E ;
Moran, BJ ;
Heald, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (08) :999-1003
[48]   Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview [J].
Stelzner, Sigmar ;
Koehler, Carsta ;
Stelzer, Juliane ;
Sims, Anja ;
Witzigmann, Helmut .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (10) :1227-1240
[49]  
Sterne J., 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[50]   Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting [J].
Stroup, DF ;
Berlin, JA ;
Morton, SC ;
Olkin, I ;
Williamson, GD ;
Rennie, D ;
Moher, D ;
Becker, BJ ;
Sipe, TA ;
Thacker, SB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (15) :2008-2012