A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:65
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
ADAM, IJ ;
MOHAMDEE, MO ;
MARTIN, IG ;
SCOTT, N ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :707-711
[2]   International Preoperative Rectal Cancer Management: Staging, Neoadjuvant Treatment, and Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams [J].
Augestad, Knut M. ;
Lindsetmo, Rolv-Ole ;
Stulberg, Jonah ;
Reynolds, Harry ;
Senagore, Anthony ;
Champagne, Brad ;
Heriot, Alexander G. ;
Leblanc, Fabien ;
Delaney, Conor P. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (11) :2689-2700
[3]   Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study [J].
Battersby, Nicholas J. ;
How, Peter ;
Moran, Brendan ;
Stelzner, Sigmar ;
West, Nicholas P. ;
Branagan, Graham ;
Strassburg, Joachim ;
Quirke, Philip ;
Tekkis, Paris ;
Pedersen, Bodil Ginnerup ;
Gudgeon, Mark ;
Heald, Bill ;
Brown, Gina .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (04) :751-760
[4]   Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Bhangu, A. ;
Ali, S. M. ;
Darzi, A. ;
Brown, G. ;
Tekkis, P. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (12) :1457-1466
[5]  
Bhangu A, 2014, ANN SURG, V259, P315, DOI [10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828a0d22, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000492]
[6]   Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study [J].
Brown, G. ;
Daniels, I. R. ;
Heald, R. J. ;
Quirke, P. ;
Blomqvist, L. ;
Sebag-Montefiore, D. ;
Moran, B. J. ;
Holm, T. ;
Strassbourg, J. ;
Peppercorn, P. D. ;
Fisher, S. E. ;
Mason, B. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7572) :779-782
[7]   Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer [J].
Bulow, S. ;
Christensen, I. J. ;
Iversen, L. H. ;
Harling, H. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (11) :1256-1264
[8]   Total pelvic exenteration for the treatment of advanced primary or recurrent pelvic neoplasia [J].
Carballo, Laura ;
Enriquez-Navascues, Jose M. ;
Saralegui, Yolanda ;
Placer, Carlos ;
Timoteo, Ander ;
Borda, Nerea ;
Carrillo, Alberto ;
Sainz-Lete, Aitor .
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2015, 93 (03) :174-180
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   Radical resection after IORT-containing multimodality treatment is the most important determinant for outcome in patients treated for locally recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Dresen, Raphaela C. ;
Gosens, Marleen J. ;
Martijn, Hendrik ;
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. ;
Creemers, Geert-Jan ;
Daniels-Gooszen, Alette W. ;
van den Brule, Adriaan J. ;
van den Berg, Hetty A. ;
Rutten, Harm J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (07) :1937-1947