Influences of Duration of Inspiratory Effort, Respiratory Mechanics, and Ventilator Type on Asynchrony With Pressure Support and Proportional Assist Ventilation

被引:22
作者
Vasconcelos, Renata S. [1 ]
Sales, Raquel P. [1 ]
Melo, Luiz H. de P. [1 ]
Marinho, Liegina S. [1 ]
Bastos, Vasco P. D. [1 ]
Nogueira, Andrea da N. C. [1 ]
Ferreira, Juliana C. [2 ]
Holanda, Marcelo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
artificial respiration; respiratory mechanics; COPD; ARDS; mechanical ventilators; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; ICU VENTILATORS; PERFORMANCE; BENCH; COMPENSATION; SLEEP; MODES; WORK; LOAD;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.05025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is often associated with patient-ventilator asynchrony. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) offers inspiratory assistance proportional to patient effort, minimizing patient-ventilator asynchrony. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of respiratory mechanics and patient effort on patient-ventilator asynchrony during PSV and PAV plus (PAV+). METHODS: We used a mechanical lung simulator and studied 3 respiratory mechanics profiles (normal, obstructive, and restrictive), with variations in the duration of inspiratory effort: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 s. The Auto-Trak system was studied in ventilators when available. Outcome measures included inspiratory trigger delay, expiratory trigger asynchrony, and tidal volume (V-T). RESULTS: Inspiratory trigger delay was greater in the obstructive respiratory mechanics profile and greatest with a effort of 2.0 s (160 ms); cycling asynchrony, particularly delayed cycling, was common in the obstructive profile, whereas the restrictive profile was associated with premature cycling. In comparison with PSV, PAV+ improved patient-ventilator synchrony, with a shorter triggering delay (28 ms vs 116 ms) and no cycling asynchrony in the restrictive profile. V-T was lower with PAV+ than with PSV (630 mL vs 837 mL), as it was with the single-limb circuit ventilator (570 mL vs 837 mL). PAV+ mode was associated with longer cycling delays than were the other ventilation modes, especially for the obstructive profile and higher effort values. Auto-Trak eliminated automatic triggering. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation asynchrony was influenced by effort, respiratory mechanics, ventilator type, and ventilation mode. In PSV mode, delayed cycling was associated with shorter effort in obstructive respiratory mechanics profiles, whereas premature cycling was more common with longer effort and a restrictive profile. PAV+ prevented premature cycling but not delayed cycling, especially in obstructive respiratory mechanics profiles, and it was associated with a lower V-T.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 557
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Patient-ventilator synchrony and sleep quality with proportional assist and pressure support ventilation
    Alexopoulou, C.
    Kondili, E.
    Plataki, M.
    Georgopoulos, D.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 (06) : 1040 - 1047
  • [2] Effects of flow triggering on breathing effort during partial ventilatory support
    Aslanian, P
    El Atrous, S
    Isabey, D
    Valente, E
    Corsi, D
    Harf, A
    Lemaire, F
    Brochard, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 157 (01) : 135 - 143
  • [3] Performance characteristics of 10 home mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode - A comparative bench study
    Battisti, A
    Tassaux, D
    Janssens, JP
    Michotte, JB
    Jaber, S
    Jolliet, P
    [J]. CHEST, 2005, 127 (05) : 1784 - 1792
  • [4] Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality
    Blanch, Lluis
    Villagra, Ana
    Sales, Bernat
    Montanya, Jaume
    Lucangelo, Umberto
    Lujan, Manel
    Garcia-Esquirol, Oscar
    Chacon, Encarna
    Estruga, Anna
    Oliva, Joan C.
    Hernandez-Abadia, Alberto
    Albaiceta, Guillermo M.
    Fernandez-Mondejar, Enrique
    Fernandez, Rafael
    Lopez-Aguilar, Josefina
    Villar, Jesus
    Murias, Gaston
    Kacmarek, Robert M.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 41 (04) : 633 - 641
  • [5] Patient-ventilator interaction and sleep in mechanically ventilated patients: Pressure support versus proportional assist ventilation
    Bosma, Karen
    Ferreyra, Gabriela
    Ambrogio, Cristina
    Pasero, Daniela
    Mirabella, Lucia
    Braghiroli, Alberto
    Appendini, Lorenzo
    Mascia, Luciana
    Ranieri, V. Marco
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (04) : 1048 - 1054
  • [6] Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony During Noninvasive Ventilation A Bench and Clinical Study
    Carteaux, Guillaume
    Lyazidi, Aissam
    Cordoba-Izquierdo, Ana
    Vignaux, Laurence
    Jolliet, Philippe
    Thille, Arnaud W.
    Richard, Jean-Christophe M.
    Brochard, Laurent
    [J]. CHEST, 2012, 142 (02) : 367 - 376
  • [7] Cycling-off criteria during pressure support ventilation: What do we have to monitor?
    Chiumello, Davide
    Colombo, Andrea
    Algieri, Ilaria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 29 (03) : 457 - 458
  • [8] A physiologic comparison of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV plus ) versus pressure support ventilation (PSV)
    Costa, R.
    Spinazzola, G.
    Cipriani, F.
    Ferrone, G.
    Festa, O.
    Arcangeli, A.
    Antonelli, M.
    Proietti, R.
    Conti, G.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (09) : 1494 - 1500
  • [9] Influence of ventilator settings on patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation with different interfaces
    Costa, R.
    Navalesi, P.
    Spinazzola, G.
    Ferrone, G.
    Pellegrini, A.
    Cavaliere, F.
    Proietti, R.
    Antonelli, M.
    Conti, G.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (08) : 1363 - 1370
  • [10] Du H L, 2001, Respir Care Clin N Am, V7, P503, DOI 10.1016/S1078-5337(05)70046-0