Do changes in income, deprivation, labour force status and family status influence smoking behaviour over the short run? Panel study of 15 000 adults

被引:17
作者
Blakely, Tony [1 ]
van der Deen, Frederieke S. [1 ]
Woodward, Alistair [2 ]
Kawachi, Ichiro [3 ]
Carter, Kristie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Publ Hlth, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Sch Populat Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Populat Hlth, Dept Soc Human Dev & Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
MARITAL TRANSITIONS; HEALTH BEHAVIORS; TOBACCO USE; INEQUALITIES; CESSATION; PROGRAMS; DIETARY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050944
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Improving social circumstances (eg, an increase in income, finding a job or moving into a good neighbourhood) may reduce tobacco use, but robust evidence on the effects of such improvements is scarce. Accordingly we investigated the link between changing social circumstances and changing tobacco smoking using repeated measures data. Methods 15 000 adults with at least two observations over three waves (each 2 years apart) of a panel study had data on smoking status, family, labour force, income and deprivation (both neighbourhood and individual). Fixed effects regression modelling was used. Findings The odds of smoking increased 1.42-fold (95% CI 1.16 to 1.74) for a one log-unit increase in personal income among 15-24-year-olds, but there was no association of increased smoking with an increase in income among 25+ year olds. Moving out of a family nucleus, increasing neighbourhood deprivation (eg, 1.83-fold (95% CI 1.18 to 2.83) increased odds of smoking for moving from least to most deprived quintile of neighbourhoods), increasing personal deprivation and moving into employment were all associated with increased odds of smoking. The number of cigarettes smoked a day changed little with changing social circumstances. Interpretation Worsening social circumstances over the short run are generally associated with higher smoking risk. However, there were counter examples: for instance, decreasing personal income among young people was associated with decreased odds of smoking, a finding consistent with income elasticity of demand (the less one's income, the less one can consume). This paper suggests that improving social circumstances is not always pro-health over the short run; a more nuanced approach to the social determinants of health is required.
引用
收藏
页码:e106 / e113
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Allison Paul., 2005, FIXED EFFECTS REGRES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PORTR HLTH KEY RES 2
[3]   Differential loss of participants does not necessarily cause selection bias [J].
Carter, Kristie N. ;
Imlach-Gunasekara, Fiona ;
McKenzie, Sarah K. ;
Blakely, Tony .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 36 (03) :218-222
[4]   Cohort Profile: Survey of Families, Income and Employment (SoFIE) and Health Extension (SoFIE-health) [J].
Carter, Kristie N. ;
Cronin, Matt ;
Blakely, Tony ;
Hayward, Michael ;
Richardson, Ken .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (03) :653-659
[5]  
Edwards R, AUST NZ J P IN PRESS
[6]   Effects of marital transitions on changes in dietary and other health behaviours in US male health professionals [J].
Eng, PM ;
Kawachi, I ;
Fitzmaurice, G ;
Rimm, EB .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (01) :56-62
[7]   Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences? [J].
Gardiner, Joseph C. ;
Luo, Zhehui ;
Roman, Lee Anne .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (02) :221-239
[8]   The impact of social capital on changes in smoking behaviour: a longitudinal cohort study [J].
Giordano, Giuseppe N. ;
Lindstrom, Martin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 21 (03) :347-354
[9]   CONCEPT OF HEALTH CAPITAL AND DEMAND FOR HEALTH [J].
GROSSMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1972, 80 (02) :223-225
[10]   Could mainstream anti-smoking programs increase inequalities in tobacco use? New Zealand data from 1981-96 [J].
Hill, SE ;
Blakely, TA ;
Fawcett, JM ;
Howden-Chapman, P .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 29 (03) :279-284