Abscopal Gene Expression in Response to Synchrotron Radiation Indicates a Role for Immunological and DNA Damage Response Genes

被引:12
|
作者
Forrester, Helen B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lobachevsky, Pavel N. [4 ,6 ,7 ]
Stevenson, Andrew W. [8 ,9 ]
Hall, Christopher J. [8 ]
Martin, Olga A. [5 ,6 ]
Sprung, Carl N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hudson Inst Med Res, Ctr Innate Immun & Infect Dis, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Res Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Adv Analyt Technol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] ANSTO, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[9] CSIRO Mfg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
INDUCED BYSTANDER; DOWN-REGULATION; RADIOTHERAPY; P53; IRRADIATION; CARCINOMA; THERAPY; RECRUITMENT; REGRESSION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1667/RADE-19-00014.1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Abscopal effects are an important aspect of targeted radiation therapy due to their implication in normal tissue toxicity from chronic inflammatory responses and mutagenesis. Gene expression can be used to determine abscopal effects at the molecular level. Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy utilizing high-intensity X rays collimated into planar microbeams is a promising cancer treatment due to its reported ability to ablate tumors with less damage to normal tissues compared to conventional broadbeam radiation therapy techniques. The low scatter of synchrotron radiation enables microbeams to be delivered to tissue effectively, and is also advantageous for out-of-field studies because there is minimal interference from scatter. Mouse legs were irradiated at a dose rate of 49 Gy/s and skin samples in the out-of-field areas were collected. The out-of-field skin showed an increase in Tnf expression and a decrease in Mdm2 expression, genes associated with inflammation and DNA damage. These expression effects from microbeam exposure were similar to those found with broadbeam exposure. In immune-deficient Ccl2 knockout mice, we identified a different gene expression profile which showed an early increase in Mdm2, Tgib1, Tnf and Ccl22 expression in out-of-field skin that was not observed in the immune-proficient mice. Our results suggest that the innate immune system is involved in out-of-field tissue responses and alterations in the immune response may not eliminate abscopal effects, but could change them. (C) 2020 by Radiation Research Society
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 687
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Senescence: A DNA damage response and its role in aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Shreeya, Tejal
    Ansari, Mohd Saifullah
    Kumar, Prabhat
    Saifi, Muskan
    Shati, Ali A.
    Alfaifi, Mohammad Y.
    Elbehairi, Serag Eldin I.
    FRONTIERS IN AGING, 2024, 4
  • [42] The role of DNA damage response proteins at telomeres- an "integrative" model
    Slijepcevic, Predrag
    DNA REPAIR, 2006, 5 (11) : 1299 - 1306
  • [43] An Emerging Regulatory Role for the Tumor Microenvironment in the DNA Damage Response to Double-Strand Breaks
    Lama-Sherpa, Tshering D.
    Shevde, Lalita A.
    MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [44] A crucial role for bone morphogenetic protein-Smad1 signalling in the DNA damage response
    Chau, Jenny Fung Ling
    Jia, Deyong
    Wang, Zhongfeng
    Liu, Zhi
    Hu, Yuanyu
    Zhang, Xin
    Jia, Hao
    Lai, Keng Po
    Leong, Wai Fook
    Au, Bi Jin
    Mishina, Yuji
    Chen, Ye-Guang
    Biondi, Christine
    Robertson, Elizabeth
    Xie, Dong
    Liu, Huijuan
    He, Lin
    Wang, Xueying
    Yu, Qiang
    Li, Baojie
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 3
  • [45] DNA damage responses in murine Pre-B cells with genetic deficiencies in damage response genes
    Innes, Cynthia L.
    Hesse, Jill E.
    Morales, Abigail J.
    Helmink, Beth A.
    Schurman, Shepherd H.
    Sleckman, Barry P.
    Paules, Richard S.
    CELL CYCLE, 2020, 19 (01) : 67 - 83
  • [46] Transcriptomic analyses of the radiation response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma subclones with different radiation sensitivity: time-course gene expression profiles and gene association networks
    Michna, Agata
    Schoetz, Ulrike
    Selmansberger, Martin
    Zitzelsberger, Horst
    Lauber, Kirsten
    Unger, Kristian
    Hess, Julia
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [47] The Role of the DNA Damage Response Mechanisms after Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and a Consideration of Potentially Sensitive Individuals
    Jeggo, Penny
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2010, 174 (06) : 825 - 832
  • [48] Lymphocytes of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Display Different DNA Damage Repair Kinetics and Expression Profiles of DNA Repair and Stress Response Genes
    Leandro, Giovana S.
    Lobo, Romulo R.
    Oliveira, Douglas V. N. P.
    Moriguti, Julio C.
    Sakamoto-Hojo, Elza T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (06): : 12380 - 12400
  • [49] Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair and damage response genes and late normal tissue complications of radiotherapy for breast cancer
    Chang-Claude, J.
    Ambrosome, C. B.
    Lilla, C.
    Kropp, S.
    Helmbold, I.
    von Fournier, D.
    Haase, W.
    Sautter-Bihl, M-L
    Wenz, F.
    Schmezer, P.
    Popanda, O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (10) : 1680 - 1686
  • [50] Identifying the target genes of SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1, a master transcription factor controlling DNA damage response in Arabidopsis
    Ogita, Nobuo
    Okushima, Yoko
    Tokizawa, Mutsutomo
    Yamamoto, Yoshiharu Y.
    Tanaka, Maho
    Seki, Motoaki
    Makita, Yuko
    Matsui, Minami
    Okamoto-Yoshiyama, Kaoru
    Sakamoto, Tomoaki
    Kurata, Tetsuya
    Hiruma, Kei
    Saijo, Yusuke
    Takahashi, Naoki
    Umeda, Masaaki
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2018, 94 (03) : 439 - 453