Assessing time series models for forecasting international migration: Lessons from the United Kingdom

被引:29
作者
Bijak, Jakub [1 ,4 ]
Disney, George [2 ,8 ]
Findlay, Allan M. [3 ,9 ]
Forster, Jonathan J. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Smith, Peter W. F. [1 ,7 ]
Wisniowski, Arkadiusz [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] ESRC Ctr Populat Change, Modelling Strand, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] ESRC Ctr Populat Change, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] ESRC Ctr Populat Change, Migrat Strand, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Dept Social Stat & Demog, Stat Demog, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Math Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Univ Southampton, Stat, Southampton, Hants, England
[7] Univ Southampton, Dept Social Stat & Demog, Social Stat, Southampton, Hants, England
[8] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ St Andrews, Sch Geog & Sustainable Dev, Human Geog, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[10] Univ Manchester, Social Stat Dept, Social Stat & Quantitat Social Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
ARIMA models; Bayesian methods; decision making; forecasting; international migration; uncertainty; POPULATION FORECASTS; IMMIGRATION; METHODOLOGY; PROJECTION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/for.2576
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Migration is one of the most unpredictable demographic processes. The aim of this article is to provide a blueprint for assessing various possible forecasting approaches in order to help safeguard producers and users of official migration statistics against misguided forecasts. To achieve that, we first evaluate the various existing approaches to modelling and forecasting of international migration flows. Subsequently, we present an empirical comparison of ex post performance of various forecasting methods, applied to international migration to and from the United Kingdom. The overarching goal is to assess the uncertainty of forecasts produced by using different forecasting methods, both in terms of their errors (biases) and calibration of uncertainty. The empirical assessment, comparing the results of various forecasting models against past migration estimates, confirms the intuition about weak predictability of migration, but also highlights varying levels of forecast errors for different migration streams. There is no single forecasting approach that would be well suited for different flows. We therefore recommend adopting a tailored approach to forecasts, and applying a risk management framework to their results, taking into account the levels of uncertainty of the individual flows, as well as the differences in their potential societal impact.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 487
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Estimation of international migration flow tables in Europe [J].
Abel, Guy J. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2010, 173 :797-825
[2]   UNCERTAIN POPULATION FORECASTING [J].
ALHO, JM ;
SPENCER, BD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 80 (390) :306-314
[3]  
Alho Juha., 2006, STAT DEMOGRAPHY FORE
[4]  
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[5]   Explaining migration: a critical view [J].
Arango, J .
INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2000, 52 (03) :283-+
[6]   Bayesian Probabilistic Projection of International Migration [J].
Azose, Jonathan J. ;
Raftery, Adrian E. .
DEMOGRAPHY, 2015, 52 (05) :1627-1650
[7]  
Bijak J., 2010, FORECASTING INT MIGR
[8]  
Bijak J., 2012, Migration Assumptions in the UK National Population Projections: Methodology Review. Report for the Office for National Statistics
[9]   Probabilistic Population Forecasts for Informed Decision Making [J].
Bijak, Jakub ;
Alberts, Isabel ;
Alho, Juha ;
Bryant, John ;
Buettner, Thomas ;
Falkingham, Jane ;
Forster, Jonathan J. ;
Gerland, Patrick ;
King, Thomas ;
Onorante, Luca ;
Keilman, Nico ;
O'Hagan, Anthony ;
Owens, Darragh ;
Raftery, Adrian ;
Sevcikova, Hana ;
Smith, Peter W. F. .
JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2015, 31 (04) :537-544
[10]   Bayesian forecasting of immigration to selected European countries by using expert knowledge [J].
Bijak, Jakub ;
Wisniowski, Arkadiusz .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2010, 173 :775-796