Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of renal function in healthy participants

被引:19
|
作者
Eikefjord, Eli [1 ,2 ]
Andersen, Erling [1 ,3 ]
Hodneland, Erlend [2 ,4 ]
Hanson, Erik A. [5 ]
Sourbron, Steven [6 ]
Svarstad, Einar [2 ,7 ]
Lundervold, Arvid [1 ,8 ]
Rorvik, Jarle T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jonas Lies Vei 65, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Clin Engn, Bergen, Norway
[4] Christian Michelsen Res CMR AS, Bergen, Norway
[5] Univ Bergen, Dept Math, Bergen, Norway
[6] Univ Leeds, Fac Med & Hlth, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Med, Bergen, Norway
[8] Univ Bergen, Dept Biomed, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Urinary; MR functional imaging; kidney; adults; imaging sequence; technology assessment; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SINGLE KIDNEY-FUNCTION; DCE-MRI; RENOGRAPHY; GFR; MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESPONSES; PERFUSION; IOHEXOL;
D O I
10.1177/0284185116666417
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: High repeatability, accuracy, and precision for renal function measurements need to be achieved to establish renal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as a clinically useful diagnostic tool. Purpose: To investigate the repeatability, accuracy, and precision of DCE-MRI measured renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using iohexol-GFR as the reference method. Material and Methods: Twenty healthy non-smoking volunteers underwent repeated DCE-MRI and an iohexol-GFR within a period of 10 days. Single-kidney (SK) MRI measurements of perfusion (blood flow, Fb) and filtration (GFR) were derived from parenchymal intensity time curves fitted to a two-compartment filtration model. The repeatability of the SK-MRI measurements was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV). Using iohexol-GFR as reference method, the accuracy of total MR-GFR was determined by mean difference (MD) and precision by limits of agreement (LoA). Results: SK-Fb (MR1, 345 +/- 84; MR2, 371 +/- 103 mL/100 mL/min) and SK-GFR (MR1, 52 +/- 14; MR2, 54 +/- 10 mL/min/ 1.73m(2)) measurements achieved a repeatability (CV) in the range of 15-22%. With reference to iohexol-GFR, MR-GFR was determined with a low mean difference but high LoA (MR1, MD 1.5 mL/min/1.73m(2), LoA [-42, 45]; MR2, MD 6.1 mL/min/1.73m(2), LoA [-26, 38]). Eighty percent and 90% of MR-GFR measurements were determined within +/- 30% of the iohexol-GFR for MR1 and MR2, respectively. Conclusion: Good repeatability of SK-MRI measurements and good agreement between MR-GFR and iohexol-GFR provide a high clinical potential of DCE-MRI for renal function assessment. A moderate precision in MR-derived estimates indicates that the method cannot yet be used in clinical routine.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 757
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Accuracy of Renal Function Measurements in Obstructive Hydronephrosis Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Renography
    Wang, Yuan-Cheng
    Chang, Di
    Zhang, Shi-Jun
    Wang, Qiang
    Ju, Shenghong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (04) : 859 - 866
  • [42] Analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images to assess renal function
    Michoux, N.
    Valee, J-P.
    Pechere-Bertschi, A.
    Montet, X.
    Buehler, L.
    Van Beers, B. E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (04) : 167 - 179
  • [43] Analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images to assess renal function
    N. Michoux
    J-P. Vallée
    A. Pechère-Bertschi
    X. Montet
    L. Buehler
    B. E. Van Beers
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2006, 19 : 167 - 179
  • [44] A modified two-compartment model for measurement of renal function using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Jiang, Kai
    Ferguson, Christopher M.
    Abumoawad, Abdelrhman
    Saad, Ahmed
    Textor, Stephen C.
    Lerman, Lilach O.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [45] Simultaneous Measurement of Kidney Function by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI and FITC-Sinistrin Clearance in Rats at 3 Tesla: Initial Results
    Zoellner, Frank G.
    Schock-Kusch, Daniel
    Baecker, Sandra
    Neudecker, Sabine
    Gretz, Norbert
    Schad, Lothar R.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11):
  • [46] Renal and systemic pH imaging by contrast-enhanced MRI
    Raghunand, N
    Howison, C
    Sherry, AD
    Zhang, SR
    Gillies, RJ
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (02) : 249 - 257
  • [47] Blind Deconvolution in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Ultrasound
    Jirik, Radovan
    Soucek, Karel
    Mezl, Martin
    Bartos, Michal
    Drazanova, Eva
    Drafi, Frantisek
    Grossova, Lucie
    Kratochvila, Jiri
    Macicek, Ondrej
    Nylund, Kim
    Hampl, Ales
    Gilja, Odd Helge
    Taxt, Torfinn
    Starcuk, Zenon, Jr.
    2014 36TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2014, : 4276 - 4279
  • [48] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for oncology drug development
    Sung, Yu Sub
    Park, Bumwoo
    Choi, Yoonseok
    Lim, Hyeong-Seok
    Woo, Dong-Cheol
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (02) : 251 - 264
  • [49] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Mice: An Investigation of Model Parameter Uncertainties
    Rukat, Tammo
    Walker-Samuel, Simon
    Reinsberg, Stefan A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2015, 73 (05) : 1979 - 1987
  • [50] Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI
    O'Connor, J. P. B.
    Tofts, P. S.
    Miles, K. A.
    Parkes, L. M.
    Thompson, G.
    Jackson, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 : S112 - S120