Kinematic analysis of handbike propulsion in various gear ratios:: Implications for joint pain

被引:23
作者
Faupin, A.
Gorce, P.
Campillo, P.
Thevenon, A.
Remy-Neris, O.
机构
[1] Univ Lille 2, Fac Sci Sport & Educ Phys, Lab Etud Motr Humaine, F-59790 Ranchin, France
[2] Univ Toulon & Var, EA 31 62, LESP, La Garde, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Reg & Univ Lille, Serv Med Phys & Readaptat, Unite Anal Mouvement 2, F-59037 Lille, France
[4] Grp Hopale, Ctr J Calve, LAMGH, Berck Sur Mer, France
关键词
handbike; kinematics; joint pain; gear ratio;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background Though considered more efficient and less constraining than the hand-rim wheelchair, the handbike has rarely been studied especially as regards its kinematic parameters. The hypothesis of this investigation is that the range of upper extremity motions are risk factors for joint pain during handbiking as is the case during hand-rim wheelchair propulsion. This paper aims to study handbike propulsion in maximal sprint conditions in order to determine potential risk factors for joint pain. Methods. Eight able-bodied participants with no experience in handbike propulsion performed three sprints of 8 s each using three gear ratios in a handbike mounted on a home-trainer. The mean velocity per arm cycle, the cycle frequency, the angular parameters for the upper extremities were calculated, as well as the corresponding angular accelerations, with the help of a 3D movement analysis. Findings. An increase in gear ratio (22/21, 32/21, and 44/21) significantly increases the maximal velocity, the flexion/extension of the trunk, as well as the adduction/abduction of the elbow, while it reduces the frequency of movements and the flexion/extension angular accelerations of the shoulder and the elbow. Regardless of what gear ratio is used, maximal angular amplitudes of the upper extremities are comparable to the values obtained with a hand-rim wheelchair. Interpretation. The high amplitudes and fast angular joint accelerations of the upper extremity found in this study are near or superior to the ergonomic recommendations generally advised. These considerations could be taken into account to prevent overuse injuries. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 566
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abel Thomas, 2003, Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, V10, P371, DOI 10.1097/01.hjr.0000096542.30533.59
[2]   Shoulder and elbow motion during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: a description using a local coordinate system [J].
Boninger, ML ;
Cooper, RA ;
Shimada, SD ;
Rudy, TE .
SPINAL CORD, 1998, 36 (06) :418-426
[3]   Wrist biomechanics during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: An analysis using a local coordinate system [J].
Boninger, ML ;
Cooper, RA ;
Robertson, RN ;
Rudy, TE .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (04) :364-372
[4]  
Cooper RA, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P323
[5]   Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion [J].
Dallmeijer, AJ ;
Zentgraaff, IDB ;
Zijp, NI ;
van der Woude, LHV .
SPINAL CORD, 2004, 42 (02) :91-98
[6]  
Davis JL, 1998, J REHABIL RES DEV, V35, P61
[7]  
DECOSTER A, 1999, BIOMEDICAL ASPECTS M, V2, P138
[8]  
Faupin A., 2003, Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry, V111, P38
[9]  
FAUPIN A, 2004, J REHABIL RES DEV S2, V41, P22
[10]  
Janssen TWJ, 2001, J REHABIL RES DEV, V38, P33