The nature of forensic science opinion - a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings

被引:98
作者
Jackson, G.
Jones, S.
Booth, G.
Champod, C.
Evett, I. W.
机构
[1] Advance Forens Sci, Dundee DD1 4BG, Scotland
[2] Forens Sci Serv Inc, Birmingham B37 7YN, W Midlands, England
[3] Forens Sci Serv Inc, Chepstow NP6 6YE, Gwent, Wales
[4] Inst Police Sci & Criminol, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Forens Sci Serv Inc, London SE1 7LP, England
关键词
investigation; evaluation; opinion; expertise; evidence; forensic science; probability; likelihood ratio; Bayes;
D O I
10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71565-9
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The questions that are asked of forensic scientists during the course of a criminal investigation, and during subsequent court proceedings, are of varied form. This paper attempts to place these questions into broad generic types and explores the difference in the inferential process that a scientist may employ when forming opinions that help answer these questions. From this model, a working definition of different roles and attributes for forensic scientists is described which may offer greater clarity for both practitioners and users of forensic science.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 44
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Probability Theory: The Logic Of Science
[2]   The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (Part 1): an approach using Bayesian networks [J].
Biedermann, A ;
Taroni, F ;
Delemont, O ;
Semadeni, C ;
Davison, AC .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 147 (01) :49-57
[3]  
Bierdermann A, 2005, FORENSIC SCI INT, V147, P59
[4]   Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions [J].
Champod, C ;
Evett, I ;
Jackson, G .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2004, 44 (03) :153-164
[5]  
Champod C., 2001, J. Forensic Identif., V51, P101
[6]  
CHAMPOD C, 2003, RR830 FOR SCI SERV
[7]   A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework [J].
Cook, R ;
Evett, IW ;
Jackson, G ;
Jones, PJ ;
Lambert, JA .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 1998, 38 (04) :231-239
[8]   A model for case assessment and interpretation [J].
Cook, R ;
Evett, IW ;
Jackson, G ;
Jones, PJ ;
Lambert, JA .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 1998, 38 (03) :151-156
[9]   Recapturing the essence of criminalistics [J].
De Forest, PR .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 1999, 39 (03) :196-208
[10]   The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements [J].
Evett, I ;
Jackson, G ;
Lambert, JA ;
McCrossan, S .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2000, 40 (04) :233-239