Initial pH, base deficit, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap predict outcome from major vascular injury

被引:236
|
作者
Kaplan, LJ [1 ]
Kellum, JA
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Gen Surg, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, CRISMA, Clin Res Invest & Syst Modeling Acute Illness Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
shock; acidosis; anion gap; strong ion gap; trauma; outcomes;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000125517.28517.74
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: This study determines whether acid-base data obtained in the emergency department correlate with outcome from major vascular injury. Design: Observational, retrospective record review of trauma patients requiring vascular repair (torso or extremity, January 1988 to December 1997). Data included age, Injury Severity Score, injury mechanism, survival, laboratory profiling, calculated anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap. Patients were divided into survivors and nonsurvivors with comparison by Student's t-test; significance was assumed for p less than or equal to .05. Multivariate logistic regression was used for further analysis of univariate predictors of mortality, and receiver operator characteristic curves were generated for mortality from each variable. Setting: Urban level I trauma facility. Patients: Trauma patients requiring vascular repair of torso or extremity injury. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Both nonsurvivors (n = 64) and survivors (n = 218) were similar with respect to age (31 +/- 9 vs. 31.5 +/- 10.5, p = 0.15) and injury mechanics (81% penetrating in survivors vs. 83% penetrating in nonsurvivors, p = .71). Nonsurvivor Injury Severity Score exceeded that of survivors (27.5 +/- 7.8 vs. 12.4 +/- 9.4, p < .001). Nonsurvivor pH (7.06 +/- 0.15 vs. 7.34 +/- 0.08, p < .001) and apparent strong ion difference (31.38 +/- 4.39 vs. 37.53 +/- 3.86, p < .001) were significantly lower, whereas nonsurvivor standard base excess (-17.9 +/- 5.1 vs. -2.9 +/- 4.4 mEq/L, p < .001), lactate (11.1 +/- 3.6 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.5 mmol/L, p < .001), anion gap (28.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 15.6 +/- 3.1, p < .001), and strong ion gap (10.8 +/- 3.2 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.8, p < .001) were higher. All but one nonsurvivor had initial emergency department pH less than or equal to7.26, standard base excess less than or equal to -7.3 mEq/L, lactate less than or equal to5 mmol/L, and strong ion gap less than or equal to5 mEq/L. All of the acid-base descriptors were strongly associated with outcome, but the strong ion gap discriminated most strongly with an area under the receiver operator characteristic of 0.991 (95% confidence interval, 0.972-0.998). Conclusions: The initial emergency department acid-base variables of pH, base deficit, lactate, anion gap, apparent strong ion difference, and strong ion gap discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors of major vascular injury. The strong ion gap is most strongly predictive of mortality following major vascular trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1124
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] Quantitative Physicochemical Analysis of Acid-Base Balance and Clinical Utility of Anion Gap and Strong Ion Gap in 806 Neonatal Calves with Diarrhea
    Trefz, F. M.
    Constable, P. D.
    Lorenz, I.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (02) : 678 - 687
  • [12] Alteration of anion gap and strong ion difference caused by hydroxyethyl starch 6% (130/0.42) and gelatin 4% in children
    Witt, Lars
    Osthaus, Wilhelm Alexander
    Juettner, Bjoern
    Heimbucher, Christian
    Suempelmann, Robert
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (10) : 934 - 939
  • [13] Strong ion gap and outcome after cardiac arrest: another nail in the coffin of traditional acid–base quantification
    Patrick M. Honore
    Olivier Joannes-Boyau
    Willem Boer
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2009, 35 : 189 - 191
  • [14] Is there a difference between strong ion gap in healthy volunteers and intensive care unit patients?
    Gunnerson, Kyle J.
    Srisawat, Nattachai
    Kellum, John A.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 25 (03) : 520 - 524
  • [15] Prognostic value of an initial strong ion gap in critically ill patients at the emergency department
    Kim, S
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (03) : S104 - S105
  • [16] INCREASED STRONG ION GAP IN DAIRY CALVES WITH DIARRHEA IS LIKELY DUE TO D-LACTATE
    Staempfli, H. R.
    Constable, P. D.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 26 (03) : 759 - 759
  • [17] Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of electrolyte concentrations on calculations of the anion gap and the strong ion difference
    Morimatsu, H
    Rocktäschel, J
    Bellomo, R
    Uchino, S
    Goldsmith, D
    Gutteridge, G
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (05) : 1077 - 1084
  • [18] Strong ion gap and outcome after cardiac arrest: another nail in the coffin of traditional acid-base quantification
    Honore, Patrick M.
    Joannes-Boyau, Olivier
    Boer, Willem
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (02) : 189 - 191
  • [19] Metabolic Acidosis and Strong Ion Gap in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
    Zheng, Cai-Mei
    Liu, Wen-Chih
    Zheng, Jing-Quan
    Liao, Min-Tser
    Ma, Wen-Ya
    Hung, Kuo-Chin
    Lu, Chien-Lin
    Wu, Chia-Chao
    Lu, Kuo-Cheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [20] Evaluation of acid-base disorders in dogs and cats presenting to an emergency room. Part 2: Comparison of anion gap, strong ion gap, and semiquantitative analysis
    Hopper, Kate
    Epstein, Steven E.
    Kass, Philip H.
    Mellema, Matthew S.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 24 (05) : 502 - 508