Patient Radiation Exposure in a Modern, Large-Volume, Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

被引:54
作者
Glatz, Andrew C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Patel, Akash [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Xiaowei [4 ]
Dori, Yoav [1 ,2 ]
Hanna, Brian D. [1 ,2 ]
Gillespie, Matthew J. [1 ,2 ]
Rome, Jonathan J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Cardiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Pediat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Catheterization; Radiation; Pediatric; Risk factors; CANCER-RISKS; CHILDREN; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; SAFETY; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00246-014-0869-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Radiation exposure from pediatric cardiac catheterization may be substantial, although published estimates vary. We sought to report patient radiation dose across a range of diagnostic and interventional cases in a modern, high-volume pediatric catheterization laboratory. We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic and interventional cases performed in our pediatric catheterization laboratory from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2011 for which radiation usage data were available as reported by the Artis Zee(A (R)) (Siemens Medical Solutions) system. Electrophysiology cases were excluded. Radiation dose was quantified as air kerma dose (mGy) and dose-area product (DAP; mu Gy m(2)). The DAP was converted to an effective dose millisievert (mSv) using the Monte Carlo method. Radiation usage data were available from 2,265 diagnostic and interventional cases with an overall median air kerma dose of 135 mGy [interquartile range (IQR) 59-433], median DAP of 760 mu Gy m(2) (IQR 281-2,810), of which 75 % (IQR 59-90 %) was derived from fluoroscopy, and median effective dose of 6.2 mSv (IQR 2.7-14.1). Air kerma dose from a single camera > 2,000 mGy occurred in 1.8 % of cases. Significant differences in all measures of radiation exposure existed based on procedural and interventional types (p = 0.0001), with interventional cases associated with the highest effective dose after adjusting for patient weight category (p < 0.001). Patient weight, age, fluoroscopy time, and proportional use of digital acquisition were independent predictors of exposure (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001; R (2) = 0.59-0.64). In a modern, large-volume pediatric catheterization laboratory, the median effective dose is 6.2 mSv with a wide range of exposure based on patient- and procedure-specific factors. Radiation monitoring is an important component of a pediatric laboratory and further dose reduction strategies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 878
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory
    Aldridge, HE
    Chisholm, RJ
    Dragatakis, L
    Roy, L
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 13 (05) : 459 - 467
  • [12] Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterization Operator Behavior Matters
    Kobayashi, Taisei
    Hirshfeld, John W., Jr.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (08)
  • [13] Effective Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Cardiac Catheterization
    Gutierrez-Barrios, Alejandro
    Camacho-Galan, Hugo
    Medina-Camacho, Francisco
    Canadas-Pruano, Dolores
    Jimenez-Moreno, Antonio
    Calle-Perez, German
    Vazquez-Garcia, Rafael
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2019, 46 (03): : 167 - 171
  • [14] Occupational and patient radiation doses in a modern cardiac electrophysiology laboratory
    Kevin A. Wunderle
    Mina K. Chung
    Sripriya Rayadurgam
    Mark A. Miller
    Nancy A. Obuchowski
    Bruce D. Lindsay
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019, 56 : 183 - 190
  • [15] Optimizing Radiation Safety in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Practical Approach
    Christopoulos, Georgios
    Makke, Lorenza
    Christakopoulos, Georgios
    Kotsia, Anna
    Rangan, Bavana V.
    Roesle, Michele
    Haagen, Donald
    Kumbhani, Dharam J.
    Chambers, Charles E.
    Kapadia, Samir
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    Banerjee, Subhash
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (02) : 291 - 301
  • [16] Radiation Safety Program for the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
    Chambers, Charles E.
    Fetterly, Kenneth A.
    Holzer, Ralf
    Lin, Pei-Jan Paul
    Blankenship, James C.
    Balter, Stephen
    Laskey, Warren K.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 77 (04) : 546 - 556
  • [17] Important Strategies to Reduce Occupational Radiation Exposure in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory No Lower Limit
    Hirshfeld, John W.
    Fiorilli, Paul N.
    Silvestry, Frank E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 1255 - 1258
  • [18] γ-H2AX Foci as a Biomarker for Patient X-Ray Exposure in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Are We Underestimating Radiation Risks?
    Beels, Laurence
    Bacher, Klaus
    De Wolf, Daniel
    Werbrouck, Joke
    Thierens, Hubert
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (19) : 1903 - 1909
  • [19] Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Operational radiation safety
    Balter, S
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 1999, 47 (03) : 347 - 353
  • [20] Radiation Dose Reduction in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Utilizing a Novel Protocol
    Wassef, Anthony W. A.
    Hiebert, Brett
    Ravandi, Amir
    Ducas, John
    Minhas, Kunal
    Vo, Minh
    Kass, Malek
    Parmar, Gurpreet
    Hussain, Farrukh
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (05) : 550 - 557