PIPELINE INTEGRITY RELIABILITY ANALYSIS LEVELS

被引:0
作者
Hassanien, Sherif [1 ]
Leblanc, Len [1 ]
Cuervo, Javier [1 ]
Cheng, Karmun [1 ]
机构
[1] Enbridge Liquid Pipelines, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2 | 2017年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Reliability engineering science is a mature discipline that has been used extensively in industries such as aviation, nuclear energy, automobiles, and structures. The application of reliability principles (especially structural reliability) in oil and gas transmission pipelines is still an active area of development. The advent of high resolution in-line inspections tools (ILI) facilitates a formal application/utilization of reliability methods in pipeline integrity in order to safely manage deformation, metal loss, and crack threats. At the same time, the massive amount of ILI data, their associated uncertainties, and the availability/accuracy of failure prediction models present a challenge for operators to effectively implement the use of reliability analysis to check the safety of integrity programs within available timeframes. On the other hand, approximate reliability techniques may affect the analysis in terms of both accuracy and precision. In this paper, a Pipeline Integrity Reliability Analysis (PIRA) approach is presented where the sophistication of the reliability analysis is staged into three levels: PIRA levels I, II and III. The three PIRA levels correspond to different representations of integrity uncertainties, uses of available validated/calibrated data, uses of statistical models for operating pressure and resistance random variables, implementation of reliability methods, and consideration of failure modes. Moreover, PIRA levels allow for improved integration of reliability analysis with the existing timelines/stages of traditional integrity programs, such that integrity data are updated as the integrity program progresses. The proposed integrity reliability approach allows for the delivery of safety checks leveraging all types of information available at any given point in time. In addition, the approach provides a full understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each PIRA level. Pipeline corrosion case studies are provided herein to illustrate how the PIRA Levels can be applied to integrity programs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Abdolrazaghi M., 2016, INT PIP C EXP CALG C
  • [2] Abdolrazaghi M., 2016, APPL RELATIVE CALIBR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, 16708 ISO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, REL BAS DES ASS ONSH
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, 13822 ISO
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, TR 5C3
  • [7] [Anonymous], LRFD HIGHW BRIDG DES
  • [8] Cheng K., 2016, INT PIP C EXP CALG C
  • [9] CSA, 2006, CSAS6 CAN HIGH BRIDG
  • [10] CSA, 2006, CSAS471 GEN REQ DES