Different Score Systems to Predict Mortality in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Which Is the Winner? The Experience of an Egyptian Center for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

被引:7
作者
El Amir, M. [1 ]
Eldeen, H. Gamal [2 ]
Mogawer, S. [1 ]
Esmat, G. [2 ]
El-Shazly, M. [3 ]
El-Garem, N. [1 ]
Abdelaziz, M. S. [2 ]
Salah, A. [3 ]
Hosny, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Cairo 11562, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Endem Hepatogastroenterol Dept, Cairo 11562, Egypt
[3] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Gen & Liver Surg, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
DISEASE SCORE; SERUM SODIUM; MELD-SCORE; MODEL; CIRRHOSIS; ALLOCATION; INDEX; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.022
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Many scoring systems have been proposed to predict the outcome of deceased donor liver transplantation. However, their impact on the outcome in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not yet been elucidated. This study sought to assess performance of preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in predicting postoperative mortality in LDLT and to compare it with other scores: MELDNa, United Kingdom End-Stage Liver Disease (UKELD), MELD to serum sodium ratio (MESO), updated MELD, donor age-MELD (D-MELD) and integrated MELD (iMELD). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed data from 86 adult Egyptian patients who underwent LDLT in a single center. Preoperative MELD, MELDNa, MESO, UKELD, updated MELD, D-MELD, and iMELD were calculated. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the performance of MELD and other scores in predicting postoperative mortality at 3 months (early) and 12 months. Results. Among the 86 patients, mean age 48 +/- 7 years, 76 (88%) were of male sex and 27 (31.4%) had died. Preoperative MELD failed to predict early mortality (AUC = 0.63; P =.066). Comparing preoperative MELD with other scores, all other scores had better predictive ability (P <.05), with D-MELD on the top of the list (AUC = 0.68, P =.016), followed closely by UKELD (AUC = 0.67, P =.025). After that were iMELD, MESO, and MELDNa with the same predictive performance (AUC = 0.65; P <.05); updated MELD had the lowest prediction (AUC = 0.640; P =.04). Moreover, all scores failed to predict mortality at 12 months (P>.05). Conclusions. Preoperative MELD failed to predict either early or 1-year mortality after LDLT. D-MELD, UKELD, MELDNa, iMELD, and MESO could be used as better predictors of early mortality than MELD; however, we need to develop an effective score system to predict mortality after LDLT.
引用
收藏
页码:2897 / 2901
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Organ allocation for chronic liver disease: model for end-stage liver disease and beyond [J].
Asrani, Sumeet K. ;
Kim, W. Ray .
CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 26 (03) :209-213
[2]  
Barber KM, 2007, HEPATOLOGY, V46, p510A
[3]   Six Score Systems to Evaluate Candidates with Advanced Cirrhosis for Orthotopic Liver Transplant: Which Is the Winner? [J].
Biselli, Maurizio ;
Gitto, Stefano ;
Gramenzi, Annagiulia ;
Di Donato, Roberto ;
Brodosi, Lucia ;
Ravaioli, Matteo ;
Grazi, Gian Luca ;
Pinna, Antonio Daniele ;
Andreone, Pietro ;
Bernardi, Mauro .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (08) :964-973
[4]   Which Score System Can Best Predict Recipient Outcomes after Living Donor Liver Transplantation? [J].
Chung, I. S. ;
Park, M. ;
Ko, J. S. ;
Gwak, M. S. ;
Kim, G. S. ;
Lee, S-K. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (02) :393-395
[5]   Pre-transplant MELD and sodium MELD scores are poor predictors of graft failure and mortality after liver transplantation [J].
Cywinski, Jacek B. ;
Mascha, Edward J. ;
You, Jing ;
Sessler, Daniel I. ;
Kapural, Leonardo ;
Argalious, Maged ;
Parker, Brian M. .
HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 5 (03) :841-849
[6]   D-MELD, a Simple Predictor of Post Liver Transplant Mortality for Optimization of Donor/Recipient Matching [J].
Halldorson, J. B. ;
Bakthavatsalam, R. ;
Fix, O. ;
Reyes, J. D. ;
Perkins, J. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (02) :318-326
[7]   Model for end-stage liver disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients [J].
Hayashi, PH ;
Forman, L ;
Steinberg, T ;
Bak, T ;
Wachs, M ;
Kugelmas, M ;
Everson, GT ;
Kam, I ;
Trotter, AF .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (07) :737-740
[8]   Model for end-stage liver disease score to serum sodium ratio index as a prognostic predictor and its correlation with portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis [J].
Huo, Teh-Ia ;
Wang, Ying-Wen ;
Yang, Ying-Ying ;
Lin, Han-Chieh ;
Lee, Pui-Ching ;
Hou, Ming-Chih ;
Lee, Fa-Yauh ;
Lee, Shou-Dong .
LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 27 (04) :498-506
[9]  
Ikegami T, 2014, TRANSPLANTATION, V97, P457, DOI 10.1097/01.TP.0000435696.23525.d0
[10]   Predicting Survival after Liver Transplantation Based on Pre-Transplant MELD Score: a Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Klein, Kristin B. ;
Stafinski, Taenia D. ;
Menon, Devidas .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12)