A generalized active subspace for dimension reduction in mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification

被引:6
|
作者
Jiang, Xiong [1 ]
Hu, Xingzhi [1 ]
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Liang, Xiao [2 ]
Wang, Ruili [3 ]
机构
[1] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Appl Phys & Computat Math, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Dimension reduction; Generalized active subspace; Aleatory uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2020.113240
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are being increasingly incorporated in verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (UQ). However, the crucial UQ of high efficiency and confidence remains challenging for mixed multidimensional uncertainties. In this study, a generalized active subspace (GAS) for dimension reduction is presented and the characteristics of GAS are investigated by interval analysis. An7 adaptive response surface model can then be employed for uncertainty propagation. Since the precise eigenvalues of interval matrix are difficult to solve in mathematics, three alternative estimate methods, i.e. interval eigenvalue analysis (IEA), empirical distribution function (EDF), and Taylor expansions, are developed for the GAS computation and practical use. The efficacy of the GAS and the estimate methods is demonstrated on three test examples: a three-dimensional response function, a standard NASA test of six-dimensional mixed uncertainties, and a NACA0012 airfoil design case of ten epistemic uncertainties. The IEA estimate is comparatively more suitable, but needs more computational cost due to the requirement of bound matrices. When the uncertainty level is small, the three methods are all applicable and the estimate based on EDF can be more efficient. The methodology exhibits high accuracy and strong adaptability in dimension reduction, thus providing a potential template for tackling a wide variety of multidimensional mixed aleatory-epistemic UQ problems. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Targeted Reduction of p-Boxes in Risk Assessments With Mixed Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties
    Rohmer, Jeremy
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [22] Towards unified aleatory and epistemic uncertainty quantification for machinery health prognostic through sequential heteroscedastic Gaussian process regression
    Liang, Tao
    Wang, Fuli
    Wang, Shu
    Li, Kang
    Ma, Xiang
    Mo, Xuelei
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2024, 62
  • [23] Uncertainty quantification based on active subspace dimensionality-reduction method for high-dimensional geometric deviations of compressors
    Song, Zhaoyun
    Wu, Yang
    Liu, Xiaoquan
    Li, Jianfeng
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (10)
  • [24] Active Subspace Uncertainty Quantification for a Polydomain Ferroelectric Phase-Field Model
    Leon, Lider S.
    Smith, Ralph C.
    Miles, Paul
    Oates, William S.
    BEHAVIOR AND MECHANICS OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND COMPOSITES XII, 2018, 10596
  • [25] Uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems with model and data dimension reduction
    Grana, Dario
    de Figueiredo, Leandro Passos
    Azevedo, Leonardo
    GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (06) : M15 - M24
  • [26] A compatible probabilistic framework for quantification of simultaneous aleatory and epistemic uncertainty of basic parameters of structures by synthesizing the change of measure and change of random variables
    Chen, Jianbing
    Wan, Zhiqiang
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2019, 78 : 76 - 87
  • [27] Active subspace analysis and uncertainty quantification for a polydomain ferroelectric phase-field model
    Leon, Lider S.
    Miles, Paul R.
    Smith, Ralph C.
    Oates, William S.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 30 (14) : 2027 - 2051
  • [28] Uncertainty quantification of kinetic models using adjoint-driven active subspace algorithms
    Hassan, Ahmed
    Sabry, Moataz
    Le Chenadec, Vincent
    Sayadi, Taraneh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2023, 39 (04) : 5209 - 5218
  • [29] Uncertainty analysis in mechanism reduction via active subspace and transition state analyses
    Su, Xingyu
    Ji, Weiqi
    Ren, Zhuyin
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2021, 227 : 135 - 146
  • [30] Integration of Dimension Reduction and Uncertainty Quantification in Designing Stretchable Strain Gauge Sensor
    Hwang, Sungkun
    Gorguluarslan, Recep M.
    Choi, Hae-Jin
    Choi, Seung-Kyum
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (02):