A generalized active subspace for dimension reduction in mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification

被引:6
|
作者
Jiang, Xiong [1 ]
Hu, Xingzhi [1 ]
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Liang, Xiao [2 ]
Wang, Ruili [3 ]
机构
[1] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Appl Phys & Computat Math, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Dimension reduction; Generalized active subspace; Aleatory uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2020.113240
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are being increasingly incorporated in verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (UQ). However, the crucial UQ of high efficiency and confidence remains challenging for mixed multidimensional uncertainties. In this study, a generalized active subspace (GAS) for dimension reduction is presented and the characteristics of GAS are investigated by interval analysis. An7 adaptive response surface model can then be employed for uncertainty propagation. Since the precise eigenvalues of interval matrix are difficult to solve in mathematics, three alternative estimate methods, i.e. interval eigenvalue analysis (IEA), empirical distribution function (EDF), and Taylor expansions, are developed for the GAS computation and practical use. The efficacy of the GAS and the estimate methods is demonstrated on three test examples: a three-dimensional response function, a standard NASA test of six-dimensional mixed uncertainties, and a NACA0012 airfoil design case of ten epistemic uncertainties. The IEA estimate is comparatively more suitable, but needs more computational cost due to the requirement of bound matrices. When the uncertainty level is small, the three methods are all applicable and the estimate based on EDF can be more efficient. The methodology exhibits high accuracy and strong adaptability in dimension reduction, thus providing a potential template for tackling a wide variety of multidimensional mixed aleatory-epistemic UQ problems. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Novel Dimension Fusion Based Polynomial Chaos Approach for Mixed Aleatory-Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification of Carbon Nanotube Interconnects
    Prasad, Aditi Krishna
    Roy, Sourajeet
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY & SIGNAL/POWER INTEGRITY (EMCSI), 2017, : 108 - 111
  • [2] Mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification with stochastic expansions and optimization-based interval estimation
    Eldred, M. S.
    Swiler, L. P.
    Tang, G.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) : 1092 - 1113
  • [3] Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification
    Dutta, Palash
    Ali, Tazid
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2015, 146 : 209 - 217
  • [4] Mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainty quantification using fuzzy set theory
    He, Yanyan
    Mirzargar, Mahsa
    Kirby, Robert M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2015, 66 : 1 - 15
  • [5] Active subspace-based dimension reduction for chemical kinetics applications with epistemic uncertainty
    Vohra, Manav
    Alexanderian, Alen
    Guy, Hayley
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2019, 204 : 152 - 161
  • [6] Mixed Aleatory-epistemic Uncertainty Modeling of Wind Power Forecast Errors in Operation Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems
    Ding, Jinfeng
    Xie, Kaigui
    Hu, Bo
    Shao, Changzheng
    Niu, Tao
    Li, Chunyan
    Pan, Congcong
    JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2022, 10 (05) : 1174 - 1183
  • [7] Mixed Aleatory-epistemic Uncertainty Modeling of Wind Power Forecast Errors in Operation Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems
    Jinfeng Ding
    Kaigui Xie
    Bo Hu
    Changzheng Shao
    Tao Niu
    Chunyan Li
    Congcong Pan
    Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2022, 10 (05) : 1174 - 1183
  • [8] A global nonprobabilistic reliability sensitivity analysis in the mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertain structures
    Zhang, Yishang
    Liu, Yongshou
    Yang, Xufeng
    Yue, Zhufeng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2014, 228 (10) : 1802 - 1814
  • [9] Confidence region method for quantification of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty
    College of Aerospace Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing
    400044, China
    不详
    210016, China
    不详
    361005, China
    Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan, 5 (908-912):
  • [10] A unifying framework to uncertainty quantification of polynomial systems subject to aleatory and epistemic uncertainty
    Crespo, Luis G.
    Giesy, Daniel P.
    Kenny, Sean P.
    Reliable Computing, 2012, 17 : 97 - 127