Validation of the Leverton Questionnaire as a screening tool for postnatal depression in Hungary

被引:6
作者
Csatordai, Sarolta [1 ]
Kozinszky, Zoltan [2 ,3 ]
Devosa, Ivan [4 ]
Dudas, Robert [5 ]
Toth, Eva [6 ]
Sikovanyecz, Janos [3 ,7 ]
Szabo, David [3 ]
Zadori, Janos
Barabas, Katalin [4 ]
Pal, Attila [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Fac Hlth Sci, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Univ Trondheim Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol, N-7021 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med & Pharmacol Ctr, Fac Gen Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
[4] Univ Szeged, Albert Szent Gyorgyi Med & Pharmacol Ctr, Fac Gen Med, Dept Psychiat,Sect Behav Sci, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge CB1 9GQ, England
[6] Univ Pecs, Fac Arts & Sci, Inst Psychol, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
[7] Univ Szeged, Kaali Inst, Ctr Assisted Reprod, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
关键词
Leverton Questionnaire; Validation; Postnatal depression; Beck Depression Inventory; SCID; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; PREVENTION; INVENTORY; VERSION; SCALE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.09.013
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the validity of the 24-item Leverton Questionnaire (LQ) in screening for postnatal depression (PND). Method: A two-phase, cross-sectional study was designed. Between January and October 2006, a sample of 1552 women attending a routine postnatal check-up at 6 weeks postpartum completed the LQ in southeast Hungary. Oil the basis of the LQ total score, the participants were stratified and randomly selected within each stratum for clinical evaluation (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the LQ to detect PND. Results: The best cut-off on the Hungarian version of the LQ for PND was 11/12, with a sensitivity of 88.0%, and a specificity of 94.4%, and a positive predictive value of 53.1%. Internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach alpha coefficients >= 0.753). The sensitivity of the modified Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in detecting PND was 86.2% and the specificity 90.4%. Although the BDI performed slightly better than the LQ in distinguishing between minor and major depression, both psychometric scales showed satisfactory screening performance. Conclusions: Our data confirm the validity of the Hungarian version of the LQ reliably to identify PND. We propose a cut-off of 11/12 for screening purposes for PND, the range of 11-14 for detecting minor depression and regarding a total score of 15 points or above as indicative of major depression. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Anastasia A., 1990, Psychological Testing, V6th
[2]   Depression and anxiety during pregnancy and six months postpartum:: a follow-up study [J].
Andersson, Liselott ;
Sundstrom-Poromaa, Inger ;
Wulff, Marianne ;
Astrom, Monica ;
Bixo, Marie .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (08) :937-944
[3]   Targeted group antenatal prevention of postnatal depression: a review [J].
Austin, MP .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 107 (04) :244-250
[4]  
Beck A.T., 1993, BECK DEPRESSION INVE
[5]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[6]  
BELSO N, 1999, DEPRESSION LIFECYCLE
[7]   Screening for postnatal depression - Validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression [J].
Berle, JO ;
Aarre, TF ;
Mykletun, A ;
Dahl, AA ;
Holsten, F .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2003, 76 (1-3) :151-156
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]  
CSATORDAI S, 2006, MAGYAR NOORVOSOK LAP, V69, P17
[10]   Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale [J].
Eberhard-Gran, M ;
Eskild, A ;
Tambs, K ;
Opjordsmoen, S ;
Samuelsen, SO .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 104 (04) :243-249