Moral Education and Transcendental Idealism

被引:3
作者
Saunders, Doe [1 ]
Sticker, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Philosophy, 51 Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HN, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Philosophy, Cotham House,Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6J1, Avon, England
来源
ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE | 2020年 / 102卷 / 04期
关键词
KANT; BELIEF; ACCOUNT; FREEDOM;
D O I
10.1515/agph-2020-1010
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this paper, we draw attention to several important tensions between Kant's account of moral education and his commitment to transcendental idealism. Our main claim is that, in locating freedom outside of space and time, transcendental idealism makes it difficult for Kant to both provide an explanation of how moral education occurs, but also to confirm that his own account actually works. Having laid out these problems, we then offer a response on Kant's behalf. We argue that, while it might look like Kant has to abandon his commitment to either moral education or transcendental idealism, there is a way in which he can maintain both.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 673
页数:28
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Allais Lucy, 2015, MANIFEST REALISM KAN, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198747130.001.0001
  • [2] Allison Henry E, 2004, KANTS TRANSCENDENTAL, VRevised and enlarged
  • [3] Allison HenryE., 1990, KANTS THEORY FREEDOM
  • [4] Ameriks K., 2003, INTERPRETING KANTS C
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, CREATING KINGDOM END
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, COMMUNITY PROGR KANT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, J APPL PHILOS, V36, P137
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1996, IDEALISM FREEDOM
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2016, HIST PHILOS Q, V33, P347
  • [10] [Anonymous], ARCH GESCH PHILOS