Robotic surgery for staging of serous papillary and clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium

被引:9
作者
Feuer, Gerald A. [1 ]
Lakhi, Nisha [1 ,2 ]
Woo, Andrew [2 ]
Salmieri, Stephen S. [1 ]
Burrell, Matthew [1 ]
Serur, Eli [2 ]
机构
[1] Northside Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30342 USA
[2] RUMC, Staten Isl, NY USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURVIVAL; CANCER; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1580
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe feasibility of robotic staging for high-risk endometrial cancer is unclear. MethodsRetrospective review of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancer open staging (OS) and robotic staging (RS) cases (2009-2011) by two gynaecological oncologists. ResultsThere were 15 OS and 17 RS cases (no conversions). Age, uterine weight and body mass index were comparable, with more stage I RS cases. Operative time (172.5 vs 124.2min, p=0.0005), blood loss (71.9 vs 310.0 ml, p=0.0002), hospital stay (5.4 vs 1.2days, p=0.0016) and lymphadenectomy yield (16.8 vs 10.2 nodes, p=0.0041) were decreased for RS. Optimal cytoreduction rates (100% vs 93%, p=0.2794), follow-up (19.9 vs 27.1months, p=0.2283) and recurrences (three vs five, p=0.5395) were equivalent. Disease-free survival (54.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.5302) and overall survival rates (81.8% vs 80.0%, p=0.9075) were equivalent. ConclusionsRobotic staging is feasible with minimal blood loss, a short operative time and recovery and good optimal cytoreduction rates. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 313
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OUTP DAT SOL DAT TRU
[2]   Management of women with uterine papillary serous cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review [J].
Boruta, David M., II ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Fader, Amanda Nickles ;
Olawaiye, Alexander B. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 115 (01) :142-153
[3]   Comparative analysis of histologic homologues of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma [J].
Caduff, RF ;
Svoboda-Newman, SM ;
Bartos, RE ;
Ferguson, AW ;
Frank, TS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 22 (03) :319-326
[4]  
da Vinci Data, ISI INT EST
[5]   Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach [J].
Feuer, Gerald A. ;
Lakhi, Nisha ;
Barker, James ;
Salmieri, Stephen ;
Burrell, Mathew .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) :520-524
[6]   Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer [J].
Fram, KM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2002, 12 (01) :57-61
[7]   Uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Evaluation of long-term survival in surgically staged patients [J].
Grice, J ;
Ek, M ;
Greer, B ;
Koh, WJ ;
Muntz, HG ;
Cain, J ;
Tamimi, H ;
Stelzer, K ;
Figge, D ;
Goff, BA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 69 (01) :69-73
[8]   Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: Perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy [J].
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Zanagnolo, Vanna ;
Noble, Brie N. ;
Kho, Rosanne M. ;
Magtibay, Paul .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) :100-105
[9]   Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: A prospective randomized study [J].
Malzoni, Mario ;
Tinelli, Raffaele ;
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Perone, Ciro ;
Rasile, Marianna ;
Iuzzolino, Domenico ;
Malzoni, Carmine ;
Reich, Harry .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (01) :126-133
[10]  
NIS, 2010, HEALTHC COST UT PROJ