How Accurate Are Blood (or Breath) Tests for Identifying Self-Reported Heavy Drinking Among People with Alcohol Dependence?

Managing patients with alcohol dependence includes assessment for heavy drinking, typically by asking patients. Some recommend biomarkers to detect heavy drinking but evidence of accuracy is limited. Among people with dependence, we assessed the performance of disialo-carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (%dCDT, a parts per thousand yen1.7%), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT, a parts per thousand yen66 U/l), either %dCDT or GGT positive, and breath alcohol (> 0) for identifying 3 self-reported heavy drinking levels: any heavy drinking (a parts per thousand yen4 drinks/day or > 7 drinks/week for women, a parts per thousand yen5 drinks/day or > 14 drinks/week for men), recurrent (a parts per thousand yen5 drinks/day on a parts per thousand yen5 days) and persistent heavy drinking (a parts per thousand yen5 drinks/day on a parts per thousand yen7 consecutive days). Subjects (n = 402) with dependence and current heavy drinking were referred to primary care and assessed 6 months later with biomarkers and validated self-reported calendar method assessment of past 30-day alcohol use. The self-reported prevalence of any, recurrent and persistent heavy drinking was 54, 34 and 17%. Sensitivity of %dCDT for detecting any, recurrent and persistent self-reported heavy drinking was 41, 53 and 66%. Specificity was 96, 90 and 84%, respectively. %dCDT had higher sensitivity than GGT and breath test for each alcohol use level but was not adequately sensitive to detect heavy drinking (missing 34-59% of the cases). Either %dCDT or GGT positive improved sensitivity but not to satisfactory levels, and specificity decreased. Neither a breath test nor GGT was sufficiently sensitive (both tests missed 70-80% of cases). Although biomarkers may provide some useful information, their sensitivity is low the incremental value over self-report in clinical settings is questionable.