PSMA expression: a potential ally for the pathologist in prostate cancer diagnosis

被引:145
作者
Bravaccini, Sara [1 ]
Puccetti, Maurizio [2 ]
Bocchini, Martine [1 ]
Ravaioli, Sara [1 ]
Celli, Monica [3 ]
Scarpi, Emanuela [4 ]
De Giorgi, Ugo [5 ]
Tumedei, Maria Maddalena [1 ]
Raulli, Giandomenico [2 ]
Cardinale, Loredana [2 ]
Paganelli, Giovanni [3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST, Biosci Lab, Meldola, Italy
[2] Santa Maria della Croci Hosp, Pathol Unit, Ravenna, Italy
[3] IRCCS, Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST, Nucl Med Unit, Meldola, Italy
[4] IRCCS, Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST, Unit Biostat & Clin Trials, Meldola, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Ist Sci Romagnolo Studio & Cura Tumori IRST, Dept Med Oncol, Meldola, Italy
关键词
MEMBRANE ANTIGEN-EXPRESSION; GENE COPY NUMBER; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; GA-68-PSMA PET/CT; GLEASON SCORE; ADENOCARCINOMA; PSA; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-22594-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (PCa) patients are risk-stratified on the basis of clinical stage and PSA level at diagnosis and the Gleason Score (GS) in prostate biopsy. However, these parameters are not completely accurate in discriminating between high-and low-risk disease, creating a need for a reliable marker to determine aggressiveness. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) appears to fulfill this need. We analyzed 79 prostate biopsies and 28 prostatectomies to assess whether PSMA expression detected by immunohistochemistry is related to GS. PSMA expression was correlated with GS in both sample types (biopsies, P < 0.0001 and prostatectomy samples, P = 0.007). We observed lower PSMA expression in Gleason pattern 3 than Gleason pattern 4, suggesting that this biomarker could be useful to distinguish between these entities (p < 0.0001). The best cut-off value of 45% immunopositivity was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In Gleason pattern 3 vs. Gleason pattern 4 and 5, PSMA sensitivity was 84.1% (95% CI 76.5%-91.7%) and specificity was 95.2% (95% CI 90.6%-99.8%), with an area under the curve of 93.1 (95% CI 88.8-97.4). Our results suggest that PSMA represents a potential ally for the pathologist in the diagnostic work-up of PCa to overcome long-standing morphological classification limits.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Aggressive Variants of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [J].
Beltran, Himisha ;
Tomlins, Scott ;
Aparicio, Ana ;
Arora, Vivek ;
Rickman, David ;
Ayala, Gustavo ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
True, Lawrence ;
Gleave, Martin E. ;
Soule, Howard ;
Logothetis, Christopher ;
Rubin, Mark A. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (11) :2846-2850
[2]  
Bostwick DG, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P2256, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2256::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-S
[4]   Initial Experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Budaeus, Lars ;
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Michl, Uwe ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Rosenbaum, Clemens .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) :393-396
[5]  
Chang Sam S, 2004, Rev Urol, V6 Suppl 10, pS13
[6]  
Chang SS, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P3192
[7]   Gleason grading of prostate cancer - Level of concordance between pathologists at the university hospital of the West Indies [J].
Coard, KC ;
Freeman, VL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 122 (03) :373-376
[8]   Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer [J].
Coley, R. Yates ;
Zeger, Scott L. ;
Mamawala, Mufaddal ;
Pienta, Kenneth J. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) :135-141
[9]   Impact of visceral metastases on outcome to abiraterone after docetaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients [J].
Conteduca, Vincenza ;
Caffo, Orazio ;
Fratino, Lucia ;
Lo Re, Giovanni ;
Basso, Umberto ;
D'Angelo, Alessandro ;
Donini, Maddalena ;
Verderame, Francesco ;
Ratta, Raffaele ;
Procopio, Giuseppe ;
Campadelli, Enrico ;
Massari, Francesco ;
Gasparro, Donatello ;
Ermacora, Paola ;
Messina, Caterina ;
Giordano, Monica ;
Alesini, Daniele ;
Zagonel, Vittorina ;
Veccia, Antonello ;
Lolli, Cristian ;
Maines, Francesca ;
De Giorgi, Ugo .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (21) :2881-2891
[10]   Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: Current and emerging therapy strategies [J].
Conteduca, Vincenza ;
Aieta, Michele ;
Amadori, Dino ;
De Giorgi, Ugo .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 92 (01) :11-24