Application of the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) method to the Caspian Sea conflict

被引:39
作者
Mianabadi, Hojjat [1 ]
Sheikhmohammady, Majid [2 ]
Mostert, Erik [1 ]
Van de Giesen, Nick [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Water Resources, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Conflict management; Fuzzy multi criteria decision making; Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA); Risk attitude; Caspian Sea; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; FUZZY QUANTIFIERS; SENSITIVITY; SELECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-014-0861-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study proposes a promising allocation mechanism of the Caspian Sea natural resources, which are presently shared among five countries. To date, these nations have been unable to reach an allocation agreement. We apply a methodology to propose the most appropriate solution under different risk attitudes of the states. This research is different from other studies regarding the Caspian Sea negotiations in that it employs risk-based fuzzy multi attribute decision making methods for simulating the risk attitudes or optimism/pessimism degrees of the decision makers. The ordered weighted averaging (OWA) approach, which considers the optimism/pessimism degree quantitatively, is used to take into account the effects of different risk attitudes of the negotiators on the final outcome. We demonstrate how one could obtain a range of alternatives under different multi attribute and risk attitudes. The induced OWA (IOWA) method is also used to determine the relative power of these states bordering the Caspian Sea by considering several attributes, including different risk attitudes of agents. Results indicate that taking into account the risk attitude (prone, neutral, averse) of the states can affect the overall ranking of the proposed solutions. The findings from this study may facilitate negotiation regarding the most preferred allocation mechanism for the Caspian Sea.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1372
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORLD ENV WATER RESO
[2]   Definition of priority areas for forest conservation through the ordered weighted averaging method [J].
Averna Valente, Roberta de Oliveira ;
Vettorazzi, Carlos Alberto .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 256 (06) :1408-1417
[3]   Sensitivity of multi-criteria decision making to linguistic quantifiers and aggregation means [J].
Ben-Arieh, D .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 48 (02) :289-309
[4]  
Bodily S., 1985, MODERN DECISION MAKI
[5]   Fallback bargaining [J].
Brams, SJ ;
Kilgour, DM .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2001, 10 (04) :287-316
[6]   Three-person multi-objective conflict decision in reservoir flood control [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Chau, KW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (03) :625-631
[7]   Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 97 (01) :33-48
[8]   Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology [J].
Choudhury, A. K. ;
Shankar, Ravi ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (03) :1776-1799
[9]  
CIA-Central Intelligence Agency Washington DC, 2001, OIL GAS INFR CASP SE
[10]   The coming of conflict to the Caspian Sea [J].
Haghayeghi, M .
PROBLEMS OF POST-COMMUNISM, 2003, 50 (03) :32-41