A Novel Subjective Perception Quality Evaluation Method of Video Based on EEG Signals

被引:0
作者
Geng, Bingrui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yujing [1 ]
Dai, Zanlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Commun Univ China, Sch Informat & Commun Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Media Convergence & Commun, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
2022 IEEE 96TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC2022-FALL) | 2022年
关键词
quality of experience; video quality; video stutter; video content; EEG signal;
D O I
10.1109/VTC2022-Fall57202.2022.10012840
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Traditional subjective QoE evaluation methods mainly rely on MOS ratings. However, the MOS ratings rely heavily on users subjective behavior feedback and are easily affected by emotional management, educational background and arbitrariness. The rating cannot show the accurate real-time quality of videos. With various wireless network communication technology, multimedia display technology and the continuous development of intelligent terminals, accurate assessment of the user experience is even more important. EEG signals, as electrophysiological signals that can reflect the thinking activities of human neural centers, can be quantified effectively without bringing into the evaluation of higher cognitive subjective bias, which is expected to more accurately measure users quality of experience. Therefore, aiming at the video quality degradation caused by the interaction between video stutter and video content, this paper proposes a method to measure video quality characterized by human EEG signal changes. The validity of QoE evaluation method based on EEG signal is proved by experimental data analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, NEW APPENDIX I DEFIN
  • [2] Arndt S, 2013, INT WORK QUAL MULTIM, P152, DOI 10.1109/QoMEX.2013.6603229
  • [3] Temporal Trajectory Aware Video Quality Measure
    Barkowsky, Marcus
    Bialkowski, Jens
    Eskofier, Bjoern
    Bitto, Roland
    Kaup, Andre
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 3 (02) : 266 - 279
  • [4] Barreda-Angeles M, 2014, IEEE IMAGE PROC, P753, DOI 10.1109/ICIP.2014.7025151
  • [5] Cassani R, 2018, INT WORK QUAL MULTIM, P246
  • [6] From QoS to QoE: A Tutorial on Video Quality Assessment
    Chen, Yanjiao
    Wu, Kaishun
    Zhang, Qian
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2015, 17 (02): : 1126 - 1165
  • [7] Du Y, 2014, BIOMED CIRC SYST C, P21, DOI 10.1109/BioCAS.2014.6981635
  • [8] Psychophysiology-Based QoE Assessment: A Survey
    Engelke, Ulrich
    Darcy, Daniel P.
    Mulliken, Grant H.
    Bosse, Sebastian
    Martini, Maria G.
    Arndt, Sebastian
    Antons, Jan-Niklas
    Chan, Kit Yan
    Ramzan, Naeem
    Brunnstrom, Kjell
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 11 (01) : 6 - 21
  • [9] HASHMI US, 2019, 2019 IEEE 90 VEH TEC, P1
  • [10] A Physiology-Based QoE Comparison of Interactive Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Tablet-Based Applications
    Keighrey, Conor
    Flynn, Ronan
    Murray, Siobhan
    Murray, Niall
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2021, 23 (23) : 333 - 341