Functioning and disability of premenopausal women with urinary incontinence: An assessment by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-WHODAS 2.0

被引:6
|
作者
de Macedo Dantas, Thaissa Hamana [1 ]
Castaneda, Luciana [2 ]
Correia, Grasiela Nascimento [1 ]
das Chagas Campelo, Clarissa Loureiro [3 ]
Dantas, Diego de Sousa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Fac Hlth Sci Trairi, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Rio Branco Ave, BR-59200000 Natal, RN, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Rio de Janeiro, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[3] State Univ Paraiba, Dept Phys Therapy, Campina Grande, Brazil
关键词
disability evaluation; functioning; International Classification of Functioning; Disability; and Health; urinary incontinence; women; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; BREAST-CANCER; BLADDER CONTROL; OLDER WOMEN; ICF; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; SEVERITY; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/nau.24073
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To analyze the association between urinary incontinence and disability status in premenopausal women. Materials and Methods The study included 120 premenopausal women recruited from six Basic Family Health Units to participate in this study. We assessed sociodemographic, gynecological, and obstetric data by using specific questions. The International Continence Society's definitions were applied to determine the presence and type of urinary incontinence, and the disability was assessed by using the 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0. Results The WHODAS scores showed that women with urinary incontinence had a worse disability in cognition (P = .023) and mobility (P = .020) domains, in addition to the total score (P = .23). Women with mixed urinary incontinence had a worse disability in mobility domain (P = .039) than those with stress or urgency incontinence. Qualitative analyses of disability showed a significant difference between women with and without urinary incontinence (P = .033), with higher percentages of incontinent women with moderate and severe disability. Women who reported urinary incontinence had 7.69 more points on the final score of WHODAS than those who did not report this outcome. Conclusions Urinary incontinence in women of reproductive age is associated with disability and worse scores of WHODAS when we compare them to women without urine leakage. The results presented can be useful for designing and adapting strategies for comprehensive care of women with urinary incontinence and disability, and developing rehabilitation programs based on functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:1767 / 1774
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disability and functioning of women with low-risk pregnancy: Assessment using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Dantas, Thaissa H. M.
    Dantas, Diego S.
    Correia, Grasiela N.
    Viana, Elizabel S. R.
    Pereira, Alianny R. R.
    Magalhaes, Adriana G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 148 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [2] Correspondence: Functioning assessment by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 67 (01) : 72 - 72
  • [3] DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Gold, Liza H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2014, 42 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [4] Functioning and disability in Brazilian stroke survivors: A study using the world health organization disability assessment schedule - WHODAS 2.0
    Janizello, Gustavo
    Da Silva, Ariadne
    Oliveira, Leia
    Mendes, Rafael
    Dos Santos, Heyriane
    Silva, Soraia
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 455
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire for women with urinary incontinence
    Ribeiro de Moura, Anna Caroline
    Rocha, Rebeca de Oliveira
    da Silva de Araujo, Ana Karoline
    de Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Moreira, Mayle Andrade
    do Nascimento, Simony Lira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (26) : 6455 - 6460
  • [6] Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia
    Gspandl, Scott
    Peirson, Ryan P.
    Nahhas, Ramzi W.
    Skale, Tracey Goodman
    Lehrer, Douglas S.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 259 : 251 - 253
  • [7] Comparing the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in children and adolescents
    de la Pena, Francisco R.
    Escalona, Mariana Paulina
    Ulloa, Rosa Elena
    Palacios-Cruz, Lino
    Palacio, Juan David
    Mayer, Pablo
    Diaz, Ricardo
    Rosetti, Marcos Francisco
    SALUD MENTAL, 2024, 47 (03) : 137 - 143
  • [8] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma
    de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    Campos, Nataly Gurgel
    Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco
    Madeira, Caroline Alves
    Almondes, Jardel Goncalves de Sousa
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [9] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    Coenen, Michaela
    Buchalla, Cassia Maria
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (07):
  • [10] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    da Costa Camara, Kaytianne Jennifer
    Alves, Barbara Marques
    Aguiar Pessoa Morano, Maria Tereza
    Sampaio Viana, Cyntia Maria
    Bucharles Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) : 5663 - 5668