Randomized Study on Early Detection of Lung Cancer with MSCT in Germany Results of the First 3 Years of Follow-up After Randomization

被引:125
作者
Becker, N. [1 ]
Motsch, E. [1 ]
Gross, M. -L. [1 ]
Eigentopf, A. [1 ]
Heussel, C. P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dienemann, H. [4 ,5 ]
Schnabel, P. A. [4 ,6 ]
Eichinger, M. [2 ,3 ]
Optazaite, D. -E. [2 ,3 ]
Puderbach, M. [2 ,3 ,7 ]
Wielpuetz, M. [3 ,8 ]
Kauczor, H. -U. [3 ]
Tremper, J. [4 ,8 ]
Delorme, S. [4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Canc Epidemiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Thoraxklin Heidelberg, Dept Radiol, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] German Ctr Lung Res DZL, TLRC Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Thoraxklin Heidelberg, Dept Surg, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Univ Saarland, Inst Pathol, Homburg, Saarland, Germany
[7] Hufeland Klinikum GmbH, Abt Radiol, Bad Langensalza, Germany
[8] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
cancer; low-dose CT; lung; randomized trial; screening; LOW-DOSE CT; SCREENING TRIAL; HEAVY SMOKERS; TOMOGRAPHY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0000000000000530
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The German Lung Cancer Screening Intervention Trial (LUSI) is one of the European randomized trials investigating the efficacy of low-dose multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as a screening tool for lung cancer. In the evaluation of the first (prevalence) screening round, we observed exceptionally high early recall rates, which made the routine application of MSCT screening questionable. Because screening may behave differently in subsequent (incidence) screening rounds, we analyzed (a) basic characteristics for the annual rounds 2 to 4, which have now also been completed, and (b) the first 3 years with complete follow-up since time of randomization. Methods: Data material was the data record of LUSI after the fourth screening round and the 3-year follow-up had been completed. Basic characteristics of screening, e.g., early recall rate, detection rate, and interval cancers as well of proportion of advanced cancers, were descriptively evaluated and, if informative, group differences were tested for statistical significance. Results: Early recall rates were significantly lower in the subsequent screening rounds than in the first one if the MSCT information from the previous screening rounds was available. Detection and biopsy rates were approximately 1% or lower, ratio of benign: malignant biopsies: 1:1.6 to 1:3. Conclusion: Our recent data may not only settle one concern regarding high recall rates in routine MSCT screening but also indicate that screening must be strictly organized to be effective. Performance indicators are similar to those in mammography screening. Nevertheless, possible consequences for the participants (diagnostic workup of suspicious findings, biopsies) are more invasive than in mammography screening.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 896
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
DeMello, Sarah ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Brewer, Brenda ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Clingan, Kathy L. ;
Duan, Fenghai ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine A. ;
Gierada, David S. ;
Jain, Amanda ;
Jones, Gordon C. ;
Mahon, Irene ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Sicks, JoRean .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (10) :920-931
[2]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[3]   UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer [J].
Baldwin, D. R. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Wald, N. J. ;
Page, R. ;
Hansell, D. M. ;
Field, J. K. .
THORAX, 2011, 66 (04) :308-313
[4]   Randomized study on early detection of lung cancer with MSCT in Germany: study design and results of the first screening round [J].
Becker, N. ;
Motsch, E. ;
Gross, M. -L. ;
Eigentopf, A. ;
Heussel, C. P. ;
Dienemann, H. ;
Schnabel, P. A. ;
Pilz, L. ;
Eichinger, M. ;
Optazaite, D. -E. ;
Puderbach, M. ;
Tremper, J. ;
Delorme, S. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 138 (09) :1475-1486
[5]   Results of Initial Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung Cancer [J].
Church, Timothy R. ;
Black, William C. ;
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Clingan, Kathy L. ;
Duan, Fenghai ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gierada, David S. ;
Jones, Gordon C. ;
Mahon, Irene ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. ;
Jain, Amanda ;
Baum, Sarah .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (21) :1980-1991
[6]   European Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trials: Post NLST [J].
Field, John K. ;
van Klaveren, Rob ;
Pedersen, Jesper H. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Paci, Eugino ;
Becker, Nikolauss ;
Infante, Maurizo ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (05) :280-286
[7]  
Greenwald P., 1996, CANC PREVENTION CONT
[8]   EUSOMA review of mammography screening [J].
Hackshaw, A .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (08) :1193-1195
[9]   Characteristics of Lung Cancers Detected by Computer Tomography Screening in the Randomized NELSON Trial [J].
Horeweg, Nanda ;
van der Aalst, Carlijn M. ;
Thunnissen, Erik ;
Nackaerts, Kristiaan ;
Weenink, Carla ;
Groen, Harry J. M. ;
Lammers, Jan-Willem J. ;
Aerts, Joachim G. ;
Scholten, Ernst T. ;
van Rosmalen, Joost ;
Mali, Willem ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187 (08) :848-854
[10]  
IARC, 2005, CERV CANC SCREEN