Inactivation Dynamics of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Microbes in Drinking Water: a Comparative Study of Chlorine and Monochloramine Disinfection

被引:0
|
作者
Qureshi, Amrah [1 ]
Hashmi, Imran [1 ]
Khan, Romana [1 ]
Rasheed, Sajida [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Environm Sci & Engn, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Univ Kotli UoK, Dept Biotechnol, Azad Jammu Kashmir, Ajk, Pakistan
关键词
chlorine; disinfection; drinking water; gram-negative bacteria; gram-positive bacteria; microbial inactivation; monochloramine; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; RECLAIMED WATER; GROWTH; RESISTANCE; KLEBSIELLA; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.3103/S1063455X20050112
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
To assure the prevention of microbial contamination and the provision of safe potable water to consumers, efficient disinfection is the final barrier. Chlorine, once a widely applied disinfectant, has essentially been re-considered by many water treatment practitioners. Since the research unveiled chlorine-associated health repercussions, the investigation shifted to more viable disinfection options such as the use of monochloramines, that remains active in the system for relatively long periods. Keeping in view, the present study compared the biocidal competence of chlorine and monochloramine to inactivate the gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa along with the gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus. A lab-scale testing batch was set up in carefully monitored conditions to investigate the response of these bacterial species to the applied disinfection dosages of 1 and 2 mg/L. Moreover, a referenced batch of control evidenced the accuracy of results. A significant difference in the response to chlorine and monochloramine was recorded both in mixed and mono-cultures of bacteria. The bench-scale inactivation experiments revealed that chlorine and monochloramine greatly damaged K. pneumoniae and S. aureus in monocultures. Whereas these bacterial species revealed greater tolerance when acted together in a mixed-cultures and, hence, an overall lower degree of disinfection was achieved. P. aeruginosa exhibited reduced vulnerability to disinfectants in mixed-cultures, marking K. pneumoniae tolerant to chlorine. Most significant correlation between disinfectant species was found at 30 min of exposure with notable logremoval of K. pneumoniae (p = 0.01), P. aeruginosa (p = 0.003) and S. aureus (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for prolonged exposures, monochloramine is advisable owing to its immediate microbial inactivation upon contact as well as enhanced stability in drinking water networks. The results could predict the pattern of bacterial inactivation in drinking water distribution networks and fill a major gap in the water sector.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 389
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inactivation Dynamics of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Microbes in Drinking Water: a Comparative Study of Chlorine and Monochloramine Disinfection
    Imran Amrah Qureshi
    Romana Hashmi
    Sajida Khan
    Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 2020, 42 : 381 - 389
  • [2] Comparison of inactivation characteristics between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in water by synergistic UV and chlorine disinfection*
    Chen, Xiaowen
    Chen, Zhuo
    Ngo, Huu Hao
    Mao, Yu
    Cao, Kefan
    Shi, Qi
    Lu, Yun
    Hu, Hong-Ying
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 333
  • [3] Chitosan Augments Photodynamic Inactivation of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Tsai, Tsuimin
    Chien, Hsiung-Fei
    Wang, Tze-Hsien
    Huang, Ching-Tsan
    Ker, Yaw-Bee
    Chen, Chin-Tin
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 55 (05) : 1883 - 1890
  • [4] Inactivation dynamics of 222 nm krypton-chlorine excilamp irradiation on Gram-positive and Gram-negative foodborne pathogenic bacteria
    Kang, Jun-Won
    Kim, Sang-Soon
    Kang, Dong-Hyun
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 109 : 325 - 333
  • [5] PROBLEMATIC GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
    KAYSER, FH
    HELVETICA CHIRURGICA ACTA, 1978, 45 (4-5) : 443 - 451
  • [6] Is it better for a bacterium to be gram-positive or gram-negative?
    Orsi, N
    Fabozzi, G
    Ambrosi, C
    Visca, P
    IUBMB LIFE, 2004, 56 (06) : 361 - 363
  • [7] Protochlorophyllide: a new photosensitizer for the photodynamic inactivation of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
    Walther, Johannes
    Broecker, Markus J.
    Waetzlich, Denise
    Nimtz, Manfred
    Rohde, Manfred
    Jahn, Dieter
    Moser, Juergen
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 290 (02) : 156 - 163
  • [8] ECOLOGY OF GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS
    FARMER, K
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1968, 279 (04): : 219 - &
  • [9] Photocatalytic inactivation of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using fluorescent light
    Pal, Amrita
    Pehkonen, Simo O.
    Yu, Liya E.
    Ray, Madhumita B.
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY A-CHEMISTRY, 2007, 186 (2-3) : 335 - 341
  • [10] Disinfection of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria using DYNAJETS® hydrodynamic cavitating jets
    Loraine, Gregory
    Chahine, Georges
    Hsiao, Chao-Tsung
    Choi, Jin-Keun
    Aley, Patrick
    ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 19 (03) : 710 - 717