Prescribing cascades in persons with Alzheimer's disease: engaging patients, caregivers, and providers in a qualitative evaluation of print educational materials

被引:11
作者
Bloomstone, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Anzuoni, Kathryn [1 ,2 ]
Cocoros, Noelle [3 ]
Gurwitz, Jerry H. [1 ,2 ]
Haynes, Kevin [4 ]
Nair, Vinit P. [5 ]
Platt, Richard [3 ]
Rochon, Paula A. [6 ]
Singh, Sonal [1 ,2 ]
Mazor, Kathleen M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[2] Meyers Primary Care Inst, 385 Grove St, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, DE USA
[5] Humana Inc, Louisville, KY USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Res Inst, Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias; Educational materials; Prescribing cascades; Medication safety; Older adults; INAPPROPRIATE BENZODIAZEPINE PRESCRIPTIONS; OLDER-ADULTS; EMPOWER; INTERVENTION; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/2042098620968310
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prescribing cascades occur when the side effect of a drug is misinterpreted as a new medical condition, and a second drug is prescribed to address the side effect. Persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are at increased risk of prescribing cascades due to greater multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and complexity of care. The objective of this study was to evaluate educational materials about prescribing cascades in persons with AD, and elicit input on their use in a future trial. Methods: We interviewed community-dwelling adults with either an AD diagnosis or a prescription drug used to treat AD (n = 12), caregivers of patients meeting the same criteria (n = 14), and providers (n = 15). We coded interview transcripts and organized themes according to the communication-human information processing model. We revised the materials based on the interviews, and surveyed participating caregivers and providers for their reactions to the revised materials. Results: Analysis of patients', caregivers', and providers' comments suggest: (a) Providers had conflicting views about the messaging of materials; (b) Caregivers were likely to read letters addressed to patients; (c) Providers were likely to ignore letters, but were receptive to patient/caregiver-initiated conversations; (d) Patients and caregivers had difficulty understanding prescribing cascades; (e) Providers worried that mailed materials would undermine trust; (f) Participants had mixed views on how materials might affect the clinical encounter; (g) Participants felt that materials would improve patient/caregiver engagement. When surveyed, most providers found the revised materials informative and actionable, and most caregivers found them understandable and useful. Conclusions: This evaluation of educational materials about prescribing cascades in patients with AD provides strong support for engaging caregivers to communicate with providers about prescribing cascades. By giving patients and caregivers a basic description of the prescribing cascade concept, our educational materials may help them prepare for a conversation with the provider, who can then tailor the discussion of the possible cascade to the specific needs of the individual patient and caregiver. However, evidence on whether materials can stimulate such conversations awaits testing in a future trial. Lay summary Patient, caregiver and provider thoughts on educational materials about prescribing and medication safety Prescribing cascades occur when the side effect of a medication is misinterpreted as a new medical condition, and a second medication is prescribed to treat the side effect. Persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are at increased risk of prescribing cascades because they often have more medical conditions, more medications, and more complex care. The goal of this study was to evaluate mailed educational materials about prescribing cascades in persons with AD, and get input on their use in a future study. We interviewed 12 adults with AD, or prescribed a medication to treat AD, 14 caregivers of persons with AD, and 15 providers. We reviewed the interview transcripts to identify important findings about our educational materials. We edited the materials based on the interviews, and sent participating caregivers and providers a questionnaire to get their reactions to the new materials. Important findings from the interviews suggest: (a) Providers had conflicting views about the recommendations given; (b) Caregivers were likely to read letters addressed to patients; (c) Providers were likely to ignore letters, but were receptive to patients/caregivers introducing the topic; (d) Patients and caregivers had difficulty understanding prescribing cascades; (e) Providers worried mailed materials would undermine trust; (f) Participants had mixed views on how materials might affect a doctor's appointment; (g) Participants felt strongly that materials would improve patient/caregiver engagement. When surveyed, almost all providers found the revised materials informative and actionable; and most caregivers found them understandable and useful. These findings provide strong support for engaging caregivers to communicate with providers about prescribing cascades. The educational materials may help patients and caregivers prepare for a conversation with the provider, who can then tailor the discussion of the possible cascade to the specific needs of the individual patient and caregiver. However, evidence on whether materials can stimulate such conversations awaits testing in a future study.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making [J].
Belcher, VN ;
Fried, TR ;
Agostini, JV ;
Tinetti, ME .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (04) :298-303
[2]   What Is Known About Preventing, Detecting, and Reversing Prescribing Cascades: A Scoping Review [J].
Brath, Hana ;
Mehta, Nishila ;
Savage, Rachel D. ;
Gill, Sudeep S. ;
Wu, Wei ;
Bronskill, Susan E. ;
Zhu, Lynn ;
Gurwitz, Jerry H. ;
Rochon, Paula A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2018, 66 (11) :2079-2085
[3]  
Bruyere Research Institute, DEPR INF PAMPHL
[4]  
Gillespie RJ, 2018, HEAL SCI REP, V1, pe45, DOI [10.1002/hsr2.45, DOI 10.1002/hsr2.45]
[5]   Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J].
Hsieh, HF ;
Shannon, SE .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) :1277-1288
[6]  
Mangin D, 2019, THER ADV DRUG SAF, V10, p2042098619838796
[7]   Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Martin, Philippe ;
Tamblyn, Robyn ;
Benedetti, Andrea ;
Ahmed, Sara ;
Tannenbaum, Cara .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (18) :1889-1898
[8]   Use of the EMPOWER brochure to deprescribe sedative-hypnotic drugs in older adults with mild cognitive impairment [J].
Martin, Philippe ;
Tannenbaum, Cara .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2017, 17 :1-5
[9]   A drug education tool developed for older adults changes knowledge, beliefs and risk perceptions about inappropriate benzodiazepine prescriptions in the elderly [J].
Martin, Philippe ;
Tamblyn, Robyn ;
Ahmed, Sara ;
Tannenbaum, Cara .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 92 (01) :81-87
[10]   An educational intervention to reduce the use of potentially inappropriate medications among older adults (EMPOWER study): protocol for a cluster randomized trial [J].
Martin, Philippe ;
Tamblyn, Robyn ;
Ahmed, Sara ;
Tannenbaum, Cara .
TRIALS, 2013, 14