Rule of law;
arbitrariness;
checks and balances;
personal virtue;
judicial;
administrative and executive decision-making;
D O I:
10.1177/1037969X19829850
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
This article summarises Professor Martin Krygier's work on the rule of law and his view that arbitrariness is its core and is under-theorised. From ancient philosophy, the author suggests that our rule of law settlement feels tentative because arbitrariness is a human characteristic that cannot be completely fixed with institutional checks and balances. The author observes that a variety of rule of law virtues are already expected of judicial decision-makers and suggests that these institutional virtues should be transferred into the administrative, executive and corporate decision-making space to advance the rule of law project.
机构:
Univ New South Wales, Law & Social Theory, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Australian Natl Univ, Regulatory Inst Network, Canberra, ACT 0200, AustraliaUniv New South Wales, Law & Social Theory, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Krygier, Martin
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO-JOURNAL OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY,
2014,
3
(01):
: 77
-
97
机构:
Univ Sheffield, Town & Reg Planning, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Sheffield, Town & Reg Planning, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
机构:
Univ New South Wales, Law & Social Theory, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Australian Natl Univ, Regulatory Inst Network, Canberra, ACT 0200, AustraliaUniv New South Wales, Law & Social Theory, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Krygier, Martin
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO-JOURNAL OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY,
2014,
3
(01):
: 77
-
97
机构:
Univ Sheffield, Town & Reg Planning, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Sheffield, Town & Reg Planning, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England