Advancing transformative sustainability: A comparative analysis of electricity service and supply innovators in the United States

被引:8
作者
Taminiau, Job [1 ,2 ]
Banks, John P. [3 ]
Bleviss, Deborah [3 ]
Byrne, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] FREE, 630 5th Ave,Suite 2000, New York, NY 10111 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, CEEP, Newark, DE USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Adv Int Studies, Washington, DC USA
关键词
community choice aggregation (CCA); electric utility; electricity services; energy governance; energy innovation; institutional change; municipal utility; polycentricity; sustainable energy utility (SEU); RENEWABLE ENERGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UTILITY; POWER;
D O I
10.1002/wene.337
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electricity sector is undergoing rapid and dramatic change. The momentum of sustainable energy technologies and business model innovation is giving rise to a "polycentric" framework of policy innovation and action organized by institutions that support customer choice and give customers the means to become electricity generators and service providers in their own right. These local experiments will have to deliver transformative change, flexibly address the electricity sector's legacy of political and administrative complexity, achieve scale and financial sustainability, and enable greater and wider stakeholder participation and choice. This article reviews the evidence to date of the importance of these experiments and examines three innovators-municipal utilities, community choice aggregators, and the sustainable energy utility-to gauge the capacity of pioneers to address climate-driven and other challenges in the electricity market. This article is categorized under: Energy Efficiency > Economics and Policy Energy Infrastructure > Economics and Policy Energy Efficiency > Systems and Infrastructure
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [11] Austin Energy, 2017, AUST EN RES GEN CLIM
  • [12] Energy service collaborations-it is a question of trust
    Backlund, Sandra
    Eidenskog, Maria
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2013, 6 (03) : 511 - 521
  • [13] Bartos MD, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P748, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2648, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2648]
  • [14] Explaining Interest Rates in Local Government Borrowing
    Bastida, Francisco
    Guillamon, Maria-Dolores
    Benito, Bernardino
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 17 (01) : 45 - 73
  • [15] Blackburn G., 2014, SOLAR VALUATION MODE, DOI [10.1016/j.tej.2013.12.002, DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2013.12.002]
  • [16] Braun G., 2015, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTUR, DOI [10.1016/j.tej.2015.05.008, DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2015.05.008]
  • [17] Byrne J., 2014, SECURE GREEN ENERGY, P1
  • [18] Byrne J., 2009, B SCI TECHNOL SOC, V29, P81, DOI DOI 10.1177/0270467609332315
  • [19] Are solar cities feasible? A review of current research
    Byrne, John
    Taminiau, Job
    Seo, Jeongseok
    Lee, Joohee
    Shin, Soojin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (03) : 239 - 256
  • [20] A review of sustainable energy utility and energy service utility concepts and applications: realizing ecological and social sustainability with a community utility
    Byrne, John
    Taminiau, Job
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 5 (02) : 136 - 154