The effects of a stem gall fly and a leaf pathogen on the reproductive output of Crofton weed, Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae), in greenhouse and field trials

被引:6
作者
Buccellato, Lisa [1 ]
Fisher, Jolene T. [1 ]
Witkowski, Ed T. F. [1 ]
Byrne, Marcus J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, DST NRF Ctr Excellence Invas Biol, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Insect-plant-pathogen interaction; Passalora ageratinae; Procecidochares utilis; Reproduction; Weed biocontrol; INVASIVE ALIEN PLANTS; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; SOUTH-AFRICA; PROCECIDOCHARES-UTILIS; EUPATORIUM-ADENOPHORUM; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; SEED PRODUCTION; AGENTS; GROWTH; BIOCONTROL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104453
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Reducing the reproductive output of an invasive weed using biocontrol can result in a decrease in population density and help control the spread of the weed. Two biocontrol agents, a stem gall fly, Procecidochares utilis (Tephritidae), and a leaf-spot fungal pathogen, Passalora ageratinae (Mycosphaerellaceae), have been released against Crofton weed, Ageratina adenophora, in South Africa. In this study we investigated the impact of the agents, individually and together, on Crofton weed's reproductive output, under both greenhouse and field conditions. Galling by P. utilis, with or without P. ageratinae, resulted in 32% fewer flowering structures per stem, compared to ungalled treatments in both the field and the greenhouse; however, without P. utilis, P. ageratinae did not reduce the number of flowering structures per stem. In the greenhouse, galled stems had 24% (single galled)-55% (double-galled) fewer filled achenes than ungalled stems, while pathogen-infected stems had 27% fewer filled achenes per stem in comparison to uninfected stems. Although the biocontrol agents reduced the number of filled achenes, the percentage germination remained high and similar for all treatments (69.3-74.4%) in the field and the greenhouse. The combination of the two agents together did not provide more control of sexual reproduction than P. utilis alone. However, Crofton weed compensates for galling with increased sideshoot growth (vegetative reproduction), which in time also flower. But P. ageratinae inhibits growth of sideshoots. Therefore, the combination of the two agents best enhances the level of control rather than either agent in isolation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 11 INT S BIOL CONTR
[2]   The impact of the flower mite Aceria acroptiloni on the invasive plant Russian knapweed, Rhaponticum repens, in its native range [J].
Asadi, Ghorbanali ;
Ghorbani, Reza ;
Cristofaro, Massimo ;
Chetverikov, Philipp ;
Petanovic, Radmila ;
Vidovic, Biljana ;
Schaffner, Urs .
BIOCONTROL, 2014, 59 (03) :367-375
[3]   GALL FORMATION IN CROFTON WEED, EUPATORIUM-ADENOPHORUM SPRENG (SYN AGERATINA-ADENOPHORA), BY THE EUPATORIUM GALL FLY PROCECIDOCHARES-UTILIS STONE (DIPTERA, TRYPETIDAE) [J].
BENNETT, PH ;
VANSTADEN, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1986, 34 (04) :473-480
[4]   A proposal to use plant demographic data to assess potential weed biological control agents impacts on non-target plant populations [J].
Blossey, Bernd ;
Davalos, Andrea ;
Simmons, Wade ;
Ding, Jianqing .
BIOCONTROL, 2018, 63 (03) :461-473
[5]   Interactions between a stem gall fly and a leaf-spot pathogen in the biological control of Ageratina adenophora [J].
Buccellato, L. ;
Byrne, M. J. ;
Witkowski, E. T. F. .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2012, 61 (03) :222-229
[6]  
Buccellato L., 2012, THESIS
[7]   Post-release evaluation of a combination of biocontrol agents on Crofton weed: testing extrapolation of greenhouse results to field conditions [J].
Buccellato, Lisa ;
Byrne, Marcus J. ;
Fisher, Jolene T. ;
Witkowski, Ed T. F. .
BIOCONTROL, 2019, 64 (04) :457-468
[8]   Ecological, practical, and political inputs into selection of weed targets: What makes a good biological control target? [J].
Charudattan, R .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 35 (03) :183-196
[9]   A Reflection on My Research in Weed Biological Control: Using What We Have Learned for Future Applications [J].
Charudattan, Raghavan .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) :208-217
[10]   Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments [J].
Clark, C. J. ;
Poulsen, J. R. ;
Levey, D. J. ;
Osenberg, C. W. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 170 (01) :128-142