Eco-gentrification and who benefits from urban green amenities: NYC's high Line

被引:72
作者
Black, Katie Jo [1 ]
Richards, Mallory [2 ]
机构
[1] Kenyon Coll, 311 Ascens Hall, Gambier, OH 43022 USA
[2] Kenyon Coll, Ascens Hall, Gambier, OH 43022 USA
关键词
Geographic Information Systems (GIS); Housing values; Green space amenities; Urban revitalization; Eco-gentrification; RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-VALUES; OPEN-SPACE; LAND-USE; ENVIRONMENTAL GENTRIFICATION; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; HEALTH; IMPACT; SEOUL; RESTORATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103900
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study estimates the impact of the introduction of New York's High Line, an elevated walkway in Manhattan by relating the increase in housing values to the issue of eco-gentrification in urban areas. Studies have shown that increasing the amount of green space can lead to gentrification: rising property values, displacement of existing residents, and a large in-migration of wealthy populations. We utilize Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to spatially model the effects of the High Line on residential property values. We exploit spatial and temporal differences of the High Line's opening to estimate its impact on residential home values. We find that homes closest to the High Line experienced a 35.3% increase in housing values. We estimate the driving force behind this premium by using a triple difference approach by analyzing elevation levels and find that homes with relatively the same height as the High Line receive the largest premium. This study serves to inform policy makers regarding potential inequality of green space provisions. We provide policy recommendations for minimizing the housing price impact of green space creation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Open space, residential property values, and spatial context
    Anderson, Soren T.
    West, Sarah E.
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 36 (06) : 773 - 789
  • [2] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, HIGH LINES NEXT BALA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, EST IN HOUS INC ACC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, The Economist
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, Working Paper
  • [7] Aram F., 2019, URBAN GREEN SPACE CO
  • [8] Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia's most populous cities
    Astell-Burt, Thomas
    Feng, Xiaoqi
    Mavoa, Suzanne
    Badland, Hannah M.
    Giles-Corti, Billie
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [9] Mental health benefits of neighbourhood green space are stronger among physically active adults in middle-to-older age: Evidence from 260,061 Australians
    Astell-Burt, Thomas
    Feng, Xiaoqi
    Kolt, Gregory S.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (05) : 601 - 606
  • [10] Do people vote with their feet? An empirical test of Tiebout's mechanism
    Banzhaf, Spencer
    Walsh, Randall P.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (03) : 843 - 863