Predictive Role of the UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 Genetic Variants and Their Haplotypes on the Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan

被引:179
|
作者
Cecchin, Erika
Innocenti, Federico
D'Andrea, Mario
Corona, Giuseppe
De Mattia, Elena
Biason, Paola
Buonadonna, Angela
Toffoli, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, Expt & Clin Pharmacol Unit, Ctr Riferimento Oncol, I-33081 Aviano, Italy
关键词
INTRINSIC DRUG-RESISTANCE; HUMAN COLON-CANCER; COMMON POLYMORPHISMS; TOXICITY; GLUCURONIDATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROMOTER; PHARMACOKINETICS; IDENTIFICATION; NEUTROPENIA;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2008.19.0314
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose UGT1A1*28 is considered the main pharmacogenetic predictor of the toxicity outcome of irinotecan-treated patients. We evaluated the effect of other UGT1A variants and haplotypes involved in 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) glucuronidation on severe toxicity and efficacy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Patients and Methods In addition to UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*60, UGT1A1*93, UGT1A7*3, and UGT1A9*22 were geno-typed in 250 metastatic colorectal cancer patients, and associations with severe hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, objective response, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival were evaluated. In a subset of 71 patients, pharmacokinetic data were also available. Results UGT1A7*3 was the only marker of severe hematologic toxicity after the first cycle ( odds ratio [ OR], 3.94; 95% CI, 1.05 to 14.82; P = .04) in a multivariate analysis. It was also associated with glucuronidation ratio (SN-38G area under the curve [AUC]/SN-38 AUC) and biliary index ( irinotecan AUC) X (SN-38 AUC/SN-38G AUC). Haplotype I (all the reference sequence alleles but UGT1A9*22) was a predictor of severe hematologic toxicity during the entire course of therapy (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.82; P = .01), together with sex (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.28; P = .05). In addition to UGT1A1*28, haplotype II (all the variant alleles but UGT1A9*22) was associated with a response rate (OR, 8.61; 95% CI, 1.75 to 42.38; P = .01). UGT1A1*28 was the only marker associated with TTP. Conclusion We propose that UGT1A variants additional to UGT1A1*28 might improve the prediction of the outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI. A UGT1A haplotype-based approach might be an efficacious strategy to achieve treatment individualization of FOLFIRI.
引用
收藏
页码:2457 / 2465
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms predict response and toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine/irinotecan
    Carlini, LE
    Meropol, NJ
    Bever, J
    Andria, ML
    Hill, T
    Gold, P
    Rogatko, A
    Wang, H
    Blanchard, RL
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (03) : 1226 - 1236
  • [2] UGT1A1*6, UGT1A7*3 and UGT1A9*1b polymorphisms are predictive markers for severe toxicity in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer treated with irinotecan-based regimens
    Cui, Chengxu
    Shu, Chang
    Cao, Dandan
    Yang, Yi
    Liu, Junbao
    Shi, Shuping
    Shao, Zhujun
    Wang, Nan
    Yang, Ting
    Liang, Hao
    Zou, Shanshan
    Hu, Songnian
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (05) : 4231 - 4237
  • [3] Differences in UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 Polymorphisms between Uzbek and Japanese Populations
    Hiromichi Maeda
    Shoichi Hazama
    Abdiev Shavkat
    Ken Okamoto
    Koji Oba
    Junichi Sakamoto
    Kenichi Takahashi
    Masaki Oka
    Daisuke Nakamura
    Ryouichi Tsunedomi
    Naoko Okayama
    Hideyuki Mishima
    Michiya Kobayashi
    Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 2014, 18 : 333 - 342
  • [4] Differences in UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 Polymorphisms between Uzbek and Japanese Populations
    Maeda, Hiromichi
    Hazama, Shoichi
    Shavkat, Abdiev
    Okamoto, Ken
    Oba, Koji
    Sakamoto, Junichi
    Takahashi, Kenichi
    Oka, Masaki
    Nakamura, Daisuke
    Tsunedomi, Ryouichi
    Okayama, Naoko
    Mishima, Hideyuki
    Kobayashi, Michiya
    MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2014, 18 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [5] UGT1A1 predicts outcome in colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and fluorouracil
    Yan Wang
    Lin Shen
    Nong Xu
    Jin-Wan Wang
    Shun-Chang Jiao
    Ze-Yuan Liu
    Jian-Ming Xu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, 18 (45) : 6635 - 6644
  • [6] UGT1A1 predicts outcome in colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and fluorouracil
    Wang, Yan
    Shen, Lin
    Xu, Nong
    Wang, Jin-Wan
    Jiao, Shun-Chang
    Liu, Ze-Yuan
    Xu, Jian-Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (45) : 6635 - 6644
  • [7] Polymorphisms in UGT1A1 and UGT1A7 may predict irinotecan toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer
    Lastraioli, S.
    Ponzanelli, A.
    Leonardi, F.
    Marroni, P.
    Serra, M.
    Sonaglio, C.
    Loiacono, F.
    Zuccaro, D.
    Naldi, N.
    Franzini, E.
    Boni, L.
    Paganuzzi, M.
    Ardizzoni, A.
    Chiara, S.
    Notaro, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : XI47 - XI47
  • [8] Genetic linkage of UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms to UGT1A1*6 is associated with low glucuronidase activity for irinotecan metabolite SN-38 in Japanese cancer patients
    Fujita, Ken-Ichi
    Ando, Yuichi
    Nagashima, Fumio
    Yamamoto, Wataru
    Endo, Hisashi
    Araki, Kazuhiro
    Kodama, Keiji
    Miya, Toshimichi
    Narabayashi, Masaru
    Sasaki, Yasutsuna
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08)
  • [9] Genetic linkage of UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms to UGT1A1*6 is associated with reduced activity for SN-38 in Japanese patients with cancer
    Fujita, Ken-Ichi
    Ando, Yuichi
    Nagashima, Fumio
    Yamamoto, Wataru
    Eodo, Hisashi
    Araki, Kazuhiro
    Kodama, Keiji
    Miya, Toshimichi
    Narabayashi, Masaru
    Sasaki, Yasutsuna
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 60 (04) : 515 - 522
  • [10] The influence of functional polymorphisms in UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 on irinotecan pharmacokinetics in Asian cancer patients.
    Rammohan, M
    Jeevananthinee, J
    Zhou, QY
    Tan, EH
    Sparreboom, A
    Verweij, J
    Balram, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 136S - 136S