Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation

被引:10
|
作者
Langone, Anthony [1 ]
Shihab, Fuad [2 ]
Pankewycz, Oleh [3 ]
Doria, Cataldo [4 ]
Wiland, Anne [5 ]
McCague, Kevin [5 ]
Chan, Laurence [6 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Erie Cty Med Ctr & Labs, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
adverse events; Cellcept; efficacy; enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; kidney transplantation; MORE; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid; Myfortic; GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DOSE REDUCTION; RECIPIENTS; CONVERSION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; IMPACT; ASSOCIATION; INTOLERANCE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.12392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
MORE was a four-yr, prospective, observational study at 40 transplant centers in the US. Data were analyzed to evaluate changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing over time in 904 de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, n=616) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=288) with tacrolimus. Induction therapy and steroid treatment were similar in the two subpopulations. The proportion of patients receiving the maximal recommended MPA dose was 80.5%, 43.9%, 39.2%, 34.6%, and 30.1% at baseline and years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. More patients received the maximal recommended MPA dose with EC-MPS vs. MMF at month 1 (79.2% vs. 71.7%, p=0.016), month 3 (68.5% vs. 56.9%, p=0.001), and month 6 (52.9% vs. 44.0%, p=0.028). Multivariate analysis showed the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death to be similar for EC-MPS vs. MMF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was similar with EC-MPS vs. MMF at all time points. There were no significant differences in any category of adverse event between the EC-MPS and MMF cohorts during follow-up, including gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, MPA dose was maintained more effectively in the first sixmonths after kidney transplantation using EC-MPS vs. MMF, without an increase in adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 967
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus:: Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes
    Budde, Klemens
    Glander, Petra
    Kraemer, Bernhard K.
    Fischer, Wolfgang
    Hoffmann, Ute
    Bauer, Steffen
    Grohmann, Jana
    Neumayer, Hans-Hellmut
    Arns, Wolfgang
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [42] Conversion to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium from mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant patients: Results of an Asia-Pacific study
    Lee, Po-Huang
    Vathsala, Anantharaman
    Han, Duck Jong
    Chan, Tak-Mao
    Wong, Hin-Seng
    Woodcock, Chad
    Kurstjens, Nicol
    NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 18 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [43] Use of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in liver transplant patients with intestinal intolerance caused by mycophenolate mofetil
    Doria, Cataldo
    Ramirez, Carlo B.
    Frank, Adam M.
    Vaccino, Silvia
    Fraser, Natalie
    Marino, Ignazio R.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 23 (06) : 882 - 886
  • [44] Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
    Djabarouti, Sarah
    Duffau, Pierre
    Lazaro, Estibaliz
    Chapouly, Candice
    Greib, Carine
    Viallard, Jean-Francois
    Pellegrin, Jean-Luc
    Saux, Marie-Claude
    Breilh, Dominique
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (05) : 689 - 699
  • [45] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium given in combination with tacrolimus has a lower incidence of serious infections in Asian renal-transplant recipients compared with mycophenolate mofetil
    Feng, J. J.
    Zhang, L. W.
    Zhao, P.
    Bow, L. M.
    Tian, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 69 : 1 - 7
  • [46] Review of the immunosuppressant enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
    Budde, K
    Glander, P
    Diekmann, F
    Waiser, J
    Fritsche, L
    Dragun, D
    Neumayer, HH
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 5 (06) : 1333 - 1345
  • [47] Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic AcidA Comparison between Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Brenda C. M. de Winter
    Teun van Gelder
    Petra Glander
    Dario Cattaneo
    Helio Tedesco-Silva
    Irmgard Neumann
    Luuk Hilbrands
    Reinier M. van Hest
    Mark D. Pescovitz
    Klemens Budde
    Ron A. A. Mathot
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2008, 47 : 827 - 838
  • [48] Randomized trial of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in multi-system autoimmune disease
    Jones, Rachel B.
    Walsh, Michael
    Chaudhry, Afzal N.
    Smith, Kenneth G. C.
    Jayne, David R. W.
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2014, 7 (06): : 562 - 568
  • [49] Randomized crossover study to assess the inter- and intrasubject variability of morning mycophenolic acid concentrations from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio
    Felipe, Claudia R.
    Park, Sung I.
    Pinheiro-Machado, Paula G.
    Garcia, Riberto
    Slade, Alan
    Schmouder, Robert
    Medina-Pestana, Jose O.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (04) : E116 - E123
  • [50] Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplant Recipients Experiencing Gastrointestinal Intolerance: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study
    Langone, Anthony J.
    Chan, Laurence
    Bolin, Paul
    Cooper, Matthew
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 91 (04) : 470 - 478