Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation

被引:10
|
作者
Langone, Anthony [1 ]
Shihab, Fuad [2 ]
Pankewycz, Oleh [3 ]
Doria, Cataldo [4 ]
Wiland, Anne [5 ]
McCague, Kevin [5 ]
Chan, Laurence [6 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Erie Cty Med Ctr & Labs, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
adverse events; Cellcept; efficacy; enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; kidney transplantation; MORE; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid; Myfortic; GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DOSE REDUCTION; RECIPIENTS; CONVERSION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; IMPACT; ASSOCIATION; INTOLERANCE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.12392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
MORE was a four-yr, prospective, observational study at 40 transplant centers in the US. Data were analyzed to evaluate changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing over time in 904 de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, n=616) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=288) with tacrolimus. Induction therapy and steroid treatment were similar in the two subpopulations. The proportion of patients receiving the maximal recommended MPA dose was 80.5%, 43.9%, 39.2%, 34.6%, and 30.1% at baseline and years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. More patients received the maximal recommended MPA dose with EC-MPS vs. MMF at month 1 (79.2% vs. 71.7%, p=0.016), month 3 (68.5% vs. 56.9%, p=0.001), and month 6 (52.9% vs. 44.0%, p=0.028). Multivariate analysis showed the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death to be similar for EC-MPS vs. MMF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was similar with EC-MPS vs. MMF at all time points. There were no significant differences in any category of adverse event between the EC-MPS and MMF cohorts during follow-up, including gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, MPA dose was maintained more effectively in the first sixmonths after kidney transplantation using EC-MPS vs. MMF, without an increase in adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 967
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Maintenance Immunosuppression: Outcomes Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Database
    Irish, William
    Arcona, Stephen
    Gifford, Ryan J.
    Baillie, G. Mark
    Cooper, Matthew
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 90 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [32] Cyclosporine Sparing Effect of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in De Novo Kidney Transplantation
    Lee, Su Hyung
    Park, Jae Berm
    Oh, Chang-Kwon
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    Kim, Sung Joo
    Ha, Jongwon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (01) : 217 - 225
  • [33] Bioavailability of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Is Differentially Affected by Pantoprazole in Healthy Volunteers
    Rupprecht, Korbinian
    Schmidt, Christoph
    Raspe, Anne
    Schweda, Frank
    Shipkova, Maria
    Fischer, Wolfgang
    Bucher, Michael
    Kees, Frieder
    Faerber, Lothar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 49 (10) : 1196 - 1201
  • [34] Changes in the Small Bowel of Symptomatic Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted from Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium
    Bunnapradist, Suphamai
    Sampaio, Marcelo S.
    Wilkinson, Alan H.
    Phuong-Thu Pham
    Huang, Edmund
    Kuo, Hung-Tien
    Anastasi, Bishoy
    Danovitch, Gabriel M.
    Lo, Simon K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 40 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [35] Sites of gastrointestinal lesion induced by mycophenolate mofetil: a comparison with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in rats
    Yichen Jia
    Rulin Wang
    Long Li
    Ying Zhang
    Jiawei Li
    Jina Wang
    Xuanchuan Wang
    Guisheng Qi
    Ruiming Rong
    Ming Xu
    Tongyu Zhu
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 19
  • [36] The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation
    Pelletier, RP
    Akin, B
    Henry, ML
    Bumgardner, GL
    Elkhammas, EA
    Rajab, A
    Ferguson, RM
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 17 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [37] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: an update
    Zhang, W.
    Ding, C.
    Zheng, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 68 : 1 - 3
  • [38] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
    Gabardi, S
    Tran, JL
    Clarkson, MR
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 37 (11) : 1685 - 1693
  • [39] Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate SodiumTolerability Profile Compared with Mycophenolate Mofetil
    Matthias Behrend
    Felix Braun
    Drugs, 2005, 65 : 1037 - 1050
  • [40] Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium: A Large, Single-Center Comparison of Dose Adjustments and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Sollinger, Hans W.
    Sundberg, Aimee K.
    Leverson, Glen
    Voss, Barbara J.
    Pirsch, John D.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 89 (04) : 446 - 451