Long-term dosing patterns of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation

被引:10
|
作者
Langone, Anthony [1 ]
Shihab, Fuad [2 ]
Pankewycz, Oleh [3 ]
Doria, Cataldo [4 ]
Wiland, Anne [5 ]
McCague, Kevin [5 ]
Chan, Laurence [6 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Erie Cty Med Ctr & Labs, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
adverse events; Cellcept; efficacy; enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; kidney transplantation; MORE; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid; Myfortic; GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DOSE REDUCTION; RECIPIENTS; CONVERSION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; IMPACT; ASSOCIATION; INTOLERANCE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.12392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
MORE was a four-yr, prospective, observational study at 40 transplant centers in the US. Data were analyzed to evaluate changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing over time in 904 de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, n=616) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=288) with tacrolimus. Induction therapy and steroid treatment were similar in the two subpopulations. The proportion of patients receiving the maximal recommended MPA dose was 80.5%, 43.9%, 39.2%, 34.6%, and 30.1% at baseline and years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. More patients received the maximal recommended MPA dose with EC-MPS vs. MMF at month 1 (79.2% vs. 71.7%, p=0.016), month 3 (68.5% vs. 56.9%, p=0.001), and month 6 (52.9% vs. 44.0%, p=0.028). Multivariate analysis showed the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death to be similar for EC-MPS vs. MMF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was similar with EC-MPS vs. MMF at all time points. There were no significant differences in any category of adverse event between the EC-MPS and MMF cohorts during follow-up, including gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, MPA dose was maintained more effectively in the first sixmonths after kidney transplantation using EC-MPS vs. MMF, without an increase in adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 967
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Improvement of Renal Transplant Recipients Converted From Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Drugs or Agents: Mycophenolate Mofetil and Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium
    Ortega, Francisco
    Sanchez-Fructuoso, Ana
    Maria Cruzado, Jose
    Carlos Gomez-Alamillo, Juan
    Alarcon, Antonio
    Pallardo, Lluis
    Maria Morales, Jose
    Oliver, Juan
    Guinea, Guillermo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [2] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium immunosuppression in renal transplant patients: efficacy and dosing
    Cooper, Matthew
    Salvadori, Maurizio
    Budde, Klemens
    Oppenheimer, Frederic
    Sollinger, Hans
    Zeier, Martin
    TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS, 2012, 26 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [3] Comparison of the exposure of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in recipients of kidney-pancreas transplantation
    Belliere, Julie
    Esposito, Laure
    Gandia, Peggy
    Duffas, Jean Pierre
    Sallusto, Federico
    Cardeau-Desangles, Isabelle
    Del Bello, Arnaud
    Rostaing, Lionel
    Kamar, Nassim
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 19 : 76 - 81
  • [4] Improved Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Quality of Life after Conversion from Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Tacrolimus
    Hwang, Hyeon Seok
    Hyoung, Bok Jin
    Kim, Sol
    Oh, Ha Young
    Kim, Yon Su
    Kim, Jung Kyung
    Kim, Yeong Hoon
    Kim, Yong Lim
    Kim, Chan Duck
    Shin, Gyu Tae
    Yang, Chul Woo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (12) : 1759 - 1765
  • [5] Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation
    Rangel, E. B.
    Melaragno, C. S.
    Sa, J. R.
    Gonzalez, A. M.
    Linhares, M. M.
    Salzedas, A.
    Medina-Pestana, J. O.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (10) : 4265 - 4269
  • [6] Randomized Trial of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Primary Renal Transplantation With Tacrolimus and Steroid Avoidance: Four-Year Analysis
    Ciancio, Gaetano
    Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
    Zarak, Alberto
    Sageshima, Junichiro
    Guerra, Giselle
    Roth, David
    Brown, Randolph
    Kupin, Warren
    Chen, Linda
    Tueros, Lissett
    Hanson, Lois
    Ruiz, Phillip
    Burke, George W., III
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 91 (11) : 1198 - 1205
  • [7] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients
    Salvadori, M
    Holzer, H
    de Mattos, A
    Sollinger, H
    Arns, W
    Oppenheimer, F
    Maca, J
    Hall, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [8] Benefits of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in pediatric renal transplant patients with stable graft function
    Meneses, Rejane de Paula
    Kotsifas, Cecilia Halusch
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 13 (02) : 188 - 193
  • [9] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
    Budde, Klemens
    Duerr, Michael
    Liefeldt, Lutz
    Neumayer, Hans-Hellmut
    Glander, Petra
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 9 (06) : 981 - 994
  • [10] Mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus
    Doukaki, Spyridoula
    Platamone, Andrea
    Alaimo, Roberta
    Bongiorno, Maria Rita
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2015, 26 (01) : 67 - 72