Detection of occult metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis using a dynamic sentinel node procedure

被引:145
作者
Horenblas, S
Jansen, L
Meinhardt, W
Hoefnagel, CA
de Jong, D
Nieweg, OE
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Urol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
penile neoplasms; carcinoma; squamous cell; lymph node excision; radionuclide imaging; biopsy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67982-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the so-called dynamic sentinel node procedure in patients with penile cancer. This new staging technique consists of excisional biopsy of the first lymph node onto which a tumor drains the so-called sentinel node, based on individual mapping of lymphatic drainage. Materials and Methods: From 1994 to 1998, 55 consecutive patients with stage T2 or greater bilateral or unilateral node negative squamous cell carcinoma of the penis were prospectively entered in this study. Tumor stage was T2N0 in 42, T2N1 in 4 and T3N0 in 9 cases. To locate the sentinel node each patient underwent lymphoscintigraphy with (99m)technetium nanocolloid injected intradermally around the tumor. The following day the sentinel node was identified intraoperatively using patent blue dye injected intradermally around the tumor and a gamma detection probe. Regional lymph node dissection was restricted to patients with a tumor positive sentinel node only. Results: Scintigraphy revealed 125 sentinel nodes in 107 inguinal regions, including no sentinel node in 2 patients, 1 or more unilateral nodes in 10 and bilateral drainage in 43. At surgery 108 sentinel nodes were removed. In 8 patients with 2 or more sentinel nodes on lymphoscintigraphy only 1 was noted intraoperatively and in 9 an additional sentinel node was removed, which was not identified by scintigraphy. All nodes were identified with the gamma detection probe. In 1 patient a wound abscess developed. Regional lymph node dissection was performed in 11 patients with sentinel node metastasis. Median followup was 22 months (range 4.1 to 61). In 1 patient lymph node metastasis was noted at followup despite prior excision of a tumor-free sentinel node. Conclusions: The dynamic sentinel node procedure is a promising staging technique to detect early metastatic dissemination of penile cancer based on individual mapping of lymphatic drainage, and enables identification of patients with clinically node negative disease requiring regional lymph node dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 104
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] CAN REGIONAL LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT BE PREDICTED IN PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PENIS
    AYYAPPAN, K
    ANANTHAKRISHNAN, N
    SANKARAN, V
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 73 (05): : 549 - 553
  • [2] CABANAS RM, 1977, CANCER, V39, P456, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<456::AID-CNCR2820390214>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-I
  • [4] CABANAS RM, 1992, UROL CLIN N AM, V19, P267
  • [5] FOSSA SD, 1987, EUR UROL, V13, P372
  • [6] SENTINEL LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY FOR STAGING PENILE CANCER
    FOWLER, JE
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1984, 23 (04) : 352 - 354
  • [7] THE ROLE OF ILIOINGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE PENIS
    FRALEY, EE
    ZHANG, G
    MANIVEL, C
    NIEHANS, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (06) : 1478 - 1482
  • [8] LYMPHATIC MAPPING AND SENTINEL LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR BREAST-CANCER
    GIULIANO, AE
    KIRGAN, DM
    GUENTHER, JM
    MORTON, DL
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (03) : 391 - 401
  • [9] Harmer MH, 1978, TNM CLASSIFICATION M
  • [10] DETECTION OF LYMPH-NODE INVASION IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA WITH ILIOPELVIC LYMPHOSCINTIGRAPHY
    HORENBLAS, S
    NUYTEN, MJC
    HOEFNAGEL, CA
    MOONEN, LMF
    DELEMARRE, JFM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 69 (02): : 180 - 182