A phase II trial of Xeloda and oxaliplatin (XELOX) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis

被引:82
作者
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Yi-yi [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Feng, Yi [1 ]
Hou, Jun [2 ]
Ji, Yuan [2 ]
Sun, Yi-hong [3 ]
Shen, Kun-tang [3 ]
Shen, Zhen-bin [3 ]
Qin, Xin-yu [3 ]
Liu, Tian-shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Para-aortic lymph node; Chemotherapy; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; CAPECITABINE; LYMPHADENECTOMY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-014-2449-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) involvement is regarded as advanced disease, and only chemotherapy is recommended from the guidelines. In unresectable cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could prolong survival if conversion to resectability could be achieved. The study was a single-arm phase II trial. Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and PAN involvement (Stations No. 16a2/16b1) were treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. After every two cycles, abdominal computed tomographic scans were repeated to evaluate the response, and surgery was performed at the physician(')s discretion in patients with sufficient tumor response, followed by chemotherapy with the same regimen to complete a total of six cycles. The primary end point was the response rate of the preoperative chemotherapy. The secondary end points were R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. A total of 48 patients were enrolled. The response rate of the first-line chemotherapy was 49.0 %, and the clinical benefit response was 85.1 %. After a median of four cycles of chemotherapy, 28 patients received surgery (58.3 %). The median PFS and OS of all patients were 10.0 and 29.8 months, respectively. Patients in the surgery group had much longer PFS (18.1 vs. 5.6 mo, P = 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 12.5 mo, P = 0.016) compared with those in the non-surgery group. For gastric cancer patients with PAN involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX demonstrated a good response rate, and a sufficient R0 resection rate, with acceptable toxicities. Further study is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1161
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Baba M, 2000, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V47, P893
  • [2] Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Becker, K
    Mueller, JD
    Schulmacher, C
    Ott, K
    Fink, U
    Busch, R
    Böttcher, K
    Siewert, JR
    Höfler, H
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 98 (07) : 1521 - 1530
  • [3] Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer
    Cunningham, David
    Starling, Naureen
    Rao, Sheela
    Iveson, Timothy
    Nicolson, Marianne
    Coxon, Fareeda
    Middleton, Gary
    Daniel, Francis
    Oates, Jacqueline
    Norman, Andrew Richard
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [4] Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer
    Cunningham, David
    Allum, William H.
    Stenning, Sally P.
    Thompson, Jeremy N.
    Van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Nicolson, Marianne
    Scarffe, J. Howard
    Lofts, Fiona J.
    Falk, Stephen J.
    Iveson, Timothy J.
    Smith, David B.
    Langley, Ruth E.
    Verma, Monica
    Weeden, Simon
    Chua, Yu Jo
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [5] The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 1471 - 1474
  • [6] New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
    Eisenhauer, E. A.
    Therasse, P.
    Bogaerts, J.
    Schwartz, L. H.
    Sargent, D.
    Ford, R.
    Dancey, J.
    Arbuck, S.
    Gwyther, S.
    Mooney, M.
    Rubinstein, L.
    Shankar, L.
    Dodd, L.
    Kaplan, R.
    Lacombe, D.
    Verweij, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) : 228 - 247
  • [7] Gastric cancer: global pattern of the disease and an overview of environmental risk factors
    Forman, D.
    Burley, V. J.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 20 (04) : 633 - 649
  • [8] Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer: long term results of the Dutch randomised FAMTX trial
    Hartgrink, HH
    van de Velde, CJH
    Putter, H
    Songun, I
    Tesselaar, MET
    Kranenbarg, EK
    de Vries, JE
    Wils, JA
    van der Bijl, J
    van Krieken, JHJM
    [J]. EJSO, 2004, 30 (06): : 643 - 649
  • [9] Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition
    Sano T.
    Kodera Y.
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2011, 14 (02) : 101 - 112
  • [10] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Liao, Yi
    Yang, Zu-li
    Peng, Jun-sheng
    Xiang, Jun
    Wang, Jian-ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 (05) : 777 - 782