Short-Term Effects of Cover Crops and Compaction on Soil Properties and Soybean Production in Illinois

被引:66
作者
Acuna, Juan C. M. [1 ]
Villamil, Maria B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dep Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
ORGANIC-CARBON; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; WEED MANAGEMENT; ROOT-GROWTH; TILLAGE; NITROGEN; SYSTEMS; MATTER; YIELD; AMELIORATION;
D O I
10.2134/agronj13.0370
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cover crops (CC) are being actively promoted in Illinois as a tool to improve soil properties and enhance crop performance and yield. Our goals were to assess the short-term ability of radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. longipinnatus) and companion CC to improve (i) soil properties and (ii) soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) growth and yield following compaction and CC treatments under conventional systems. We used a 6 x 3 factorial arrangement of the CC and compaction treatments in a completely randomized design with two replications in two independent yearlocations hereby referred as environments. Cover crop treatments included radish alone R, and with rye (Secale cereale L.) RR, triticale (x Triticosecale Presto) RTR, buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum L. Moench) RB, or hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) RHV, and a control with no cover crop NCOV. Compaction treatments were no compaction (Nc), and two levels of compaction achieved with a large tractor (LT) or a hauling truck (TK). Compaction was temporarily achieved and disappeared after the CC growing season. Cover crop treatments significantly lowered soil NO3-N compared to NCOV yet no further effect was evident on soils. Soybean yield for CC treatments were not different from control plots. Results from this study showed that one growing season was not enough time to evidence changes in soil properties related to cover cropping yet they were useful tools for retaining NO3-N in the system. In addition, following adequate management practices, CC should not affect soybean growth and yield.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 870
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1982, ASTM STAND BUILD COD, V2, P836
[2]  
Amezketa E., 1999, RE VIEW, V14, P83, DOI [10.1300/J064v14n02_08, DOI 10.1300/J064V14N02_08]
[3]   Plant-induced changes in soil structure: Processes and feedbacks [J].
Angers, DA ;
Caron, J .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 42 (1-2) :55-72
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INV US GREENH GAS EM
[5]  
Blake GR., 1986, Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. SSSA Book Ser, V5, P363, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2ED.C13
[6]   Light interception efficiency and light quality affect yield compensation of soybean at low plant populations [J].
Board, J .
CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (05) :1285-1294
[7]  
Board J.E., 2011, SOYBEAN PHYSL BIOCH, P1, DOI DOI 10.5772/17596
[8]   EXPLANATIONS FOR GREATER LIGHT INTERCEPTION IN NARROW-ROW VS WIDE-ROW SOYBEAN [J].
BOARD, JE ;
HARVILLE, BG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (01) :198-202
[9]   Soil compaction produced by tractor with radial and cross-ply tyres in two tillage regimes [J].
Botta, G. F. ;
Rivero, D. ;
Tourn, M. ;
Melcon, F. Bellora ;
Pozzolo, O. ;
Nardon, G. ;
Balbuena, R. ;
Becerra, A. Tolon ;
Rosatto, H. ;
Stadler, S. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2008, 101 (1-2) :44-51
[10]   Effect of soil compaction on organic carbon amounts and distribution, South-Central Iowa [J].
Brevik, E ;
Fenton, T ;
Moran, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2002, 116 :S137-S141