Maternal use of oral contraceptives and risk of birth defects in Denmark: prospective, nationwide cohort study

被引:26
作者
Charlton, Brittany M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Molgaard-Nielsen, Ditte [4 ]
Svanstroem, Henrik [4 ]
Wohlfahrt, Jan [4 ]
Pasternak, Bjoern [4 ]
Melbye, Mads [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Adolescent & Young Adult Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Epidemiol Res, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2016年 / 352卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SEX-HORMONE EXPOSURE; CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS; VITAMIN-A; PREGNANCY; SCORE; REGISTRATION; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.h6712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION Is oral contraceptive use around the time of pregnancy onset associated with an increased risk of major birth defects? METHODS In a prospective observational cohort study, data on oral contraceptive use and major birth defects were collected among 880 694 live births from Danish registries between 1997 and 2011. We conservatively assumed that oral contraceptive exposure lasted up to the most recently filled prescription. The main outcome measure was the number of major birth defects throughout one year follow-up (defined according to the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies classification). Logistic regression estimated prevalence odds ratios of any major birth defect as well as categories of birth defect subgroups. STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS Prevalence of major birth defects (per 1000 births) was consistent across each oral contraceptive exposure group (25.1, never users; 25.0, use >3 months before pregnancy onset (reference group); 24.9, use 0-3 months before pregnancy onset (that is, recent use); 24.8, use after pregnancy onset). No increase in prevalence of major birth defects was seen with oral contraceptive exposure among women with recent use before pregnancy (prevalence odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03)) or use after pregnancy onset (0.95 (0.84 to 1.08)), compared with the reference group. There was also no increase in prevalence of any birth defect subgroup (for example, limb defects). It is unknown whether women took oral contraceptives up to the date of their most recently filled prescription. Also, the rarity of birth defects made disaggregation of the results difficult. Residual confounding was possible, and the analysis lacked information on folate, one of the proposed mechanisms. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Oral contraceptive exposure just before or during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major birth defects.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pre-gravid oral contraceptive use in relation to birth weight: a prospective cohort study
    Hatch, Elizabeth E.
    Hahn, Kristen A.
    Mikkelsen, Ellen M.
    Riis, Anders H.
    Sorensen, Henrik Toft
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Wise, Lauren A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 30 (11) : 1199 - 1208
  • [32] Paternal use of antidepressants and offspring outcomes in Sweden: nationwide prospective cohort study
    Viktorin, Alexander
    Levine, Stephen Z.
    Altemus, Margret
    Reichenberg, Abraham
    Sandin, Sven
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 361
  • [33] Prevalence and Risk of Birth Defects Observed in a Prospective Cohort Study: The Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children's Health
    Hanaoka, Tomoyuki
    Tamura, Naomi
    Ito, Kumiko
    Sasaki, Seiko
    Araki, Atsuko
    Ikeno, Tamiko
    Miyashita, Chihiro
    Ito, Sachiko
    Minakami, Hisanori
    Cho, Kazutoshi
    Endo, Toshiaki
    Baba, Tsuyoshi
    Miyamoto, Toshinobu
    Sengoku, Kazuo
    Kishi, Reiko
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 125 - 132
  • [34] Asthma Medication Use and Risk of Birth Defects: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011
    Howley, Meredith M.
    Papadopoulos, Eleni A.
    Van Bennekom, Carla M.
    Van Zutphen, Alissa R.
    Carmichael, Suzan L.
    Munsie, JeanPierre W.
    Herdt, Michele L.
    Browne, Marilyn L.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2020, 8 (10) : 3490 - +
  • [35] Risk of preterm birth associated with maternal gingival inflammation and oral hygiene behaviours in rural Nepal: a community-based, prospective cohort study
    Erchick, Daniel J.
    Khatry, Subarna K.
    Agrawal, Nitin K.
    Katz, Joanne
    LeClerq, Steven C.
    Rai, Bhola
    Reynolds, Mark A.
    Mullany, Luke C.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [36] Racial Differences in the Association Between Maternal Antenatal Depression and Preterm Birth Risk: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Ncube, Collette N.
    Enquobahrie, Daniel A.
    Gavin, Amelia R.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (12) : 1312 - 1318
  • [37] Childhood Hardship, Maternal Smoking, and Birth Outcomes A Prospective Cohort Study
    Harville, Emily W.
    Boynton-Jarrett, Renee
    Power, Chris
    Hyppoenen, Elina
    ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2010, 164 (06): : 533 - 539
  • [38] Maternal Use of Oral Contraceptives During Early Pregnancy and Risk of Hypospadias in Male Offspring
    Norgaard, Mette
    Wogelius, Pia
    Pedersen, Lars
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    UROLOGY, 2009, 74 (03) : 583 - 587
  • [39] Trajectories of maternal D-dimer are associated with the risk of developing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: A prospective birth cohort study
    Zhu, Yibing
    Liu, Zhaozhen
    Miao, Chong
    Wang, Xiaomei
    Liu, Wenjuan
    Chen, Shali
    Gao, Haiyan
    Li, Wei
    Wu, Zhengqin
    Cao, Hua
    Li, Haibo
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2023, 543
  • [40] Adverse effects of maternal lead levels on birth outcomes in the ALSPAC study: a prospective birth cohort study
    Taylor, C. M.
    Golding, J.
    Emond, A. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (03) : 322 - 328