Maternal use of oral contraceptives and risk of birth defects in Denmark: prospective, nationwide cohort study

被引:26
|
作者
Charlton, Brittany M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Molgaard-Nielsen, Ditte [4 ]
Svanstroem, Henrik [4 ]
Wohlfahrt, Jan [4 ]
Pasternak, Bjoern [4 ]
Melbye, Mads [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Adolescent & Young Adult Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Epidemiol Res, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2016年 / 352卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SEX-HORMONE EXPOSURE; CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS; VITAMIN-A; PREGNANCY; SCORE; REGISTRATION; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.h6712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION Is oral contraceptive use around the time of pregnancy onset associated with an increased risk of major birth defects? METHODS In a prospective observational cohort study, data on oral contraceptive use and major birth defects were collected among 880 694 live births from Danish registries between 1997 and 2011. We conservatively assumed that oral contraceptive exposure lasted up to the most recently filled prescription. The main outcome measure was the number of major birth defects throughout one year follow-up (defined according to the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies classification). Logistic regression estimated prevalence odds ratios of any major birth defect as well as categories of birth defect subgroups. STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS Prevalence of major birth defects (per 1000 births) was consistent across each oral contraceptive exposure group (25.1, never users; 25.0, use >3 months before pregnancy onset (reference group); 24.9, use 0-3 months before pregnancy onset (that is, recent use); 24.8, use after pregnancy onset). No increase in prevalence of major birth defects was seen with oral contraceptive exposure among women with recent use before pregnancy (prevalence odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03)) or use after pregnancy onset (0.95 (0.84 to 1.08)), compared with the reference group. There was also no increase in prevalence of any birth defect subgroup (for example, limb defects). It is unknown whether women took oral contraceptives up to the date of their most recently filled prescription. Also, the rarity of birth defects made disaggregation of the results difficult. Residual confounding was possible, and the analysis lacked information on folate, one of the proposed mechanisms. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Oral contraceptive exposure just before or during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major birth defects.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Oral Contraceptives in Pregnancy and Major Structural Birth Defects in Offspring
    Waller, Dorothy Kim
    Gallaway, Michael Shayne
    Taylor, Lockwood G.
    Ramadhani, Tunu A.
    Canfield, Mark A.
    Scheuerle, Angela
    Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia
    Louik, Carol
    Correa, Adolfo
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) : 232 - 239
  • [2] Use of Oral Fluconazole during Pregnancy and the Risk of Birth Defects
    Molgaard-Nielsen, Ditte
    Pasternak, Bjoern
    Hviid, Anders
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (09) : 830 - 839
  • [3] Maternal greenness exposure and preterm birth in Brazil: A nationwide birth cohort study*
    Ye, Tingting
    Xu, Rongbin
    Abramson, Michael J.
    Guo, Yuming
    Zhang, Yiwen
    Saldiva, Paulo H. N.
    Coelho, Micheline S. Z. S.
    Li, Shanshan
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 343
  • [4] Maternal Asthma Medication Use and the Risk of Selected Birth Defects
    Lin, Shao
    Munsie, Jean Pierre W.
    Herdt-Losavio, Michele L.
    Druschel, Charlotte M.
    Campbell, Kimberly
    Browne, Marilyn L.
    Romitti, Paul A.
    Olney, Richard S.
    Bell, Erin M.
    PEDIATRICS, 2012, 129 (02) : E317 - E324
  • [5] Maternal use of antibiotics and the risk of orofacial clefts: a nationwide cohort study
    Molgaard-Nielsen, Ditte
    Hviid, Anders
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 (03) : 246 - 253
  • [6] Maternal occupation and the risk of birth defects: an overview from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study
    Herdt-Losavio, M. L.
    Lin, S.
    Chapman, B. R.
    Hooiveld, M.
    Olshan, A.
    Liu, X.
    DePersis, R. D.
    Zhu, J.
    Druschel, C. M.
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2010, 67 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [7] Maternal anemia and birth weight: A prospective cohort study
    Morais Godoy Figueiredo, Ana Claudia
    Gomes-Filho, Isaac Suzart
    Tuy Batista, Josicelia Estrela
    Orrico, Gessica Santana
    Lima Porto, Edla Carvalho
    Cruz Pimenta, Rodolfo Macedo
    Conceicao, Sarah dos Santos
    Brito, Sheila Monteiro
    Xavier Ramos, Michelle de Santana
    Ferreira Sena, Maria Cristina
    Silva Lessa Vilasboas, Saulo Wesley
    da Cruz, Simone Seixas
    Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [8] Maternal anaemia and preterm birth: a prospective cohort study
    Zhang, Qiaoyi
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Li, Zhu
    Smulian, John C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (05) : 1380 - 1389
  • [9] Maternal risk factors for preterm birth in Taiwan, a nationwide population-based cohort study
    Wu, Sheng-Ting
    Lin, Ching-Heng
    Lin, Yi-Hsuan
    Hsu, Ya-Chi
    Hsu, Chung-Ting
    Lin, Ming-Chih
    PEDIATRICS AND NEONATOLOGY, 2024, 65 (01) : 38 - 47
  • [10] Maternal genitourinary infections and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study
    Howley, Meredith M.
    Feldkamp, Marcia L.
    Papadopoulos, Eleni A.
    Fisher, Sarah C.
    Arnold, Kathryn E.
    Browne, Marilyn L.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH, 2018, 110 (19): : 1443 - 1454