Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy:: The pericanal electrode insertion technique

被引:72
作者
Häusler, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Dept ENT Head & Neck Surg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
cochlear implantation; glass ionomer cement; transcanal ear surgery;
D O I
10.1080/00016480260349773
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective-A new minimally invasive cochlear implantation method with direct electrode insertion through the external auditory canal (EAC) is presented. Material and methods-Surgery begins with a retroauricular skin incision. The bony surface of the mastoid plane behind the ear is dissected free and the skin of the EAC is elevated together with the posterior part of the tympanic membrane. Cochleostomy is performed through the EAC with a microdrill anterior to the round window. A rim is drilled into the postero-superior region of the bony EAC immediately above the incus towards the outer border of the EAC and connected to the retroauricular surface by a short tunnel. The implant device is placed in the usual retroauricular area. The electrode is inserted through the tunnel and rim into the tympanic cavity and pushed into the cochleostomy hole. The electrode is immobilized in the rim using glass ionomer cement and covered with bone dust. After placement of the ground electrode, the retroauricular incision is closed. The tympano-meatal flap is replaced and a dressing is put into the EAC. Results-The new method has been applied thus far in 15 adults and pre-adolescent deaf patients (8 females, 7 males). A MED-EL Combi 40+ device was used in 14 patients and a Nucleus CI24M in 1. Pericanal electrode insertion was easy, with insertion depths into the cochlea of greater than or equal to30 mm with the MED-EL and of 20 mm with the Nucleus device. There were no surgical complications, infections or electrode extrusions during postoperative observation periods ranging from 6 months to >2 years. The functional results were comparable to those obtained with cochlear implantation via mastoidectomy. The pericanal electrode insertion technique has several advantages, the most important being that the danger of facial nerve damage is minimized and that the operating time is reduced by up to 50%. Conclusion-Cochlear implantation with pericanal electrode insertion is a simple, fast and particularly safe option which may replace the classical transmastoidal cochlear implantation method in adults and older children.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 719
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   USE OF A GLASS IONOMER CEMENT IN OTOLOGIC SURGERY - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
BABIGHIAN, G .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1992, 106 (11) :954-959
[2]  
BANFAI P, 1983, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V411, P9
[3]   SURGERY FOR MULTIPLE-ELECTRODE COCHLEAR IMPLANTATIONS [J].
CLARK, GM ;
PYMAN, BC ;
BAILEY, QR .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1979, 93 (03) :215-223
[4]   MEDICAL OR SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE NUCLEUS MULTICHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT [J].
COHEN, NL ;
HOFFMAN, RA ;
STROSCHEIN, M .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1988, 97 (05) :8-13
[5]   COMPLICATIONS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT-SURGERY IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN [J].
COHEN, NL ;
HOFFMAN, RA .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1991, 100 (09) :708-711
[6]  
Dost P, 2000, LARYNGO RHINO OTOL, V79, P53
[7]   Ionomeric cement implants in the middle ear of the baboon (Papio ursinus) as a primate model [J].
Geyer, G ;
Stadtgen, A ;
Schmager, K ;
Jonck, L .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1998, 255 (08) :402-409
[8]  
GEYER G, 1993, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V250, P253
[9]   Cochlear implant deep-insertion surgery [J].
Gstoettner, WK ;
Baumgartner, WD ;
Franz, P ;
Hamzavi, J .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (04) :544-546
[10]  
Häusler R, 2000, LARYNGO RHINO OTOL, V79, P95