Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A retrospective study in a tertiary institute

被引:31
作者
Chen, Yun-An [1 ]
Wu, Chih-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Chi-Shun [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, 1650 Taiwan Blvd Sect 4, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Inst Biomed Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Cent Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Med Lab Sci & Biotechnol, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
cytopathology; Milan System; MSRSGC; salivary gland; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; LESIONS; CYTOLOGY; RISK; CHONDROBLASTOMA; MANAGEMENT; PITFALLS;
D O I
10.1002/dc.24279
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been widely used in the preoperative evaluation of salivary gland lesions. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a tiered risk-stratification scheme designed to standardize reporting and facilitate decision making. We aimed to clarify the validity and diagnostic utility of the MSRSGC-based classification of salivary gland lesions. Methods A total of 1020 salivary gland FNA specimens were retrieved between 2008 and 2017, with histologic follow-up data available for 349 specimens. Within the present retrospective study, each specimen with follow-up data was reclassified according to the MSRSGC diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), suspicious for malignancy (SM), and malignant. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated based on the histologic follow-up data. Results The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the MSRSGC-based classification of the malignant potential of salivary gland lesions were 80.1%, 70.4%, 99.2%, 90.5%, and 96.7%, respectively. The ROM calculated for specimens assigned to the nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, AUS, benign neoplasm, SUMP, SM, and malignant categories were 8.6%, 15.4%, 36.8%, 2.6%, 32.3%, 71.4%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion The present results confirm the validity and diagnostic utility of MSRSGC, supporting its use in clinical practice to help devise adequate management strategies for salivary gland lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1167
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Cystic major salivary gland lesions: Utilizing fine needle aspiration to optimize the clinical management of a broad and diverse differential diagnosis [J].
Allison, Derek B. ;
McCuiston, Austin M. ;
Kawamoto, Satomi ;
Eisele, David W. ;
Bishop, Justin A. ;
Maleki, Zahra .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 45 (09) :800-807
[2]   Diagnostic pitfalls in fine-needle aspiration cytology of temporomandibular chondroblastoma:: Report of two cases [J].
Cabrera, Rafael Adame ;
Almeida, Margarida ;
Mendonca, M. Evelina ;
Frable, W. J. .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 34 (06) :424-429
[3]   Chondroblastoma An Update [J].
Chen, Wenqian ;
DiFrancesco, Lisa M. .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 141 (06) :867-871
[4]  
de Silva M V Chandu, 2003, Ann Diagn Pathol, V7, P205, DOI 10.1016/S1092-9134(03)00048-0
[5]  
Faquin W, 2018, The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology, P182
[6]  
Faquin WC, 2008, ESSENT CYTOPATHOL, P115
[7]   Subtyping salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential based on cell type demonstrates differential risk of malignancy [J].
Hang, Jen-Fan ;
Alruwaii, Fatimah ;
Zeng, Bao-Rung ;
Lai, Chiung-Ru ;
Wu, Howard H. .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 126 (11) :924-933
[8]   Northern Italy in the American South: Assessing interobserver reliability within the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology [J].
Hollyfield, Johnathan M. ;
O'Connor, Siobhan M. ;
Maygarden, Susan J. ;
Greene, Kevin G. ;
Scanga, Lori R. ;
Tang, Sherry ;
Dodd, Leslie G. ;
Wobker, Sara E. .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 126 (06) :390-396
[9]  
Hughes JH, 2005, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V129, P26
[10]  
Kilpatrick SE, 2013, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, V5, P262