Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials

被引:22
作者
Carrubba, Simona
Frilot, Clifton
Chesson, Andrew
Marino, Andrew A.
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Cellular Biol & Anat, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Allied Hlth, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Neurol, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
关键词
event-related potentials; nonlinear method; auditory evoked potentials; magnetosensory evoked potentials; recurrence analysis; time averaging; magnetic field;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.03.022
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The methods used to evaluate event-related potentials (ERPs) are generally insensitive to nonlinear responses. Our goal was to show that nonlinear ERPs could be detected using recurrence analysis (RA). When fixed-phase sine signals were added to baseline electroencephalograms (EEGs), the added linear determinism was detected by signal averaging, as expected, and by RA. However, when nonlinear determinism was simulated by adding either random-phase sine or Lorenz signals, the added signals were detected only by RA. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were studied in five subjects using RA. We detected not only the characteristic linear effects caused by onset and offset of the sound, but also nonlinear AEPs not previously reported; they occurred at 473-661 ms after onset, and 282-602 ms after offset, depending on the subject. In five other subjects we found nonlinear magnetosensory evoked potentials; they occurred at 209-354 ms after field onset, depending on the subject. RA was less sensitive than time averaging for detecting linear ERPs, but had the advantage of being able to detect nonlinear ERPs. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Abarbanel H., 1996, ANAL OBSERVED CHAOTI
[2]   Nonlinear phase desynchronization in human electroencephalographic data [J].
Breakspear, M .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2002, 15 (03) :175-198
[3]   Modelling event-related responses in the brain [J].
David, O ;
Harrison, L ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 25 (03) :756-770
[4]   RECURRENCE PLOTS OF DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS [J].
ECKMANN, JP ;
KAMPHORST, SO ;
RUELLE, D .
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1987, 4 (09) :973-977
[5]   Is it positive or negative? On determining ERP components [J].
Graben, PB ;
Frisch, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 51 (08) :1374-1382
[6]  
Lopes da Silva F. H., 1999, ELECTROENECPHALOGRAP
[7]  
LORENZ EN, 1963, J ATMOS SCI, V20, P130, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses [J].
Makeig, S ;
Westerfield, M ;
Jung, TP ;
Enghoff, S ;
Townsend, J ;
Courchesne, E ;
Sejnowski, TJ .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5555) :690-694
[10]   Event-related brain dynamics [J].
Penny, WD ;
Kiebel, SJ ;
Kilner, JM ;
Rugg, MD .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2002, 25 (08) :387-389