Antimicrobial use in the Australian pig industry: results of a national survey

被引:51
作者
Jordan, D. [1 ]
Chin, J. J-C [1 ]
Fahy, V. A. [2 ]
Barton, M. D. [3 ]
Smith, M. G. [4 ]
Trott, D. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] New S Wales Dept Primary Ind, Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia
[2] NSW DPI, Elizabeth MacArthur Agr Inst, Camden, NSW, Australia
[3] Victorian DPI, Pig Hlth & Res Unit, Epsom, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ S Australia, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Fac Nat Resources Agr & Vet Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
antibiotics; antimicrobials; pigs; surveys; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; FOOD ANIMALS; HUMAN HEALTH; VETERINARY-MEDICINE; ANTIBIOTIC USE; PUBLIC-HEALTH; RESISTANCE; SWINE; CAMPYLOBACTER; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-0813.2009.00430.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
To describe how various antimicrobials are used in commercial pig herds in Australia and for what disease conditions. Managers of large pig herds (> 200 sows) across Australia and their veterinarians participated in an internet-based survey in 2006. Questions were asked about herd management, the occurrence of bacterial diseases and the type and frequency of antimicrobial use. An antimicrobial usage index for each herd was derived as a summary of the risk of selection for antimicrobial resistance. Relationships between responses were explored with univariate and multivariate analysis. Responses were received for 197 herds estimated to represent at least 51% of all large pig herds in Australia. Most piggeries relied on drugs of low importance in human medicine (e.g. tetracyclines, penicillins and sulfonamides). For the two drugs of high importance in human medicine that can be legally prescribed to pigs in Australia, ceftiofur use was reported in 25% of herds and virginiamycin in none. Infections attributed to Lawsonia, Mycoplasma and Escherichia coli motivated the most use of antimicrobials. No useful association was found between management factors and the antimicrobial use index. Most antimicrobial use in the Australian pig industry is based on drugs of low importance to public health. Enhanced control of E. coli infections without reliance on antimicrobials would further reduce the risk of selecting for antimicrobial resistance relevant to public health. The amount of variation in the usage index between herds suggests that antimicrobial use should be constantly reviewed on a herd by herd basis. Aust Vet J 2009;87:222-229.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 229
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark
[2]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2008, 7218055001 AUSTR BUR
[3]  
*AUSTR PORK LIM, AUSTR PIG ANN 2005
[4]  
Barton MD, 2007, MICROBIOL AUST, V28, P179
[5]   A survey of group-level antibiotic prescriptions in pig production in France [J].
Chauvin, C ;
Beloeil, PA ;
Orand, JP ;
Sanders, P ;
Madec, F .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (02) :109-120
[6]  
Collignon P, 2004, J FOOD PROTECT, V67, P2369, DOI 10.4315/0362-028X-67.11.2369
[7]   Potential human health benefits of antibiotics used in food animals: a case study of virginiamycin [J].
Cox, LA .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 31 (04) :549-563
[8]  
CRAY PJ, 2008, P INT C EM INF DIS, P92
[9]   Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production [J].
Cromwell, GL .
ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 13 (01) :7-27
[10]   Individual and group antimicrobial usage rates on 34 farrow-to-finish swine farms in Ontario, Canada [J].
Dunlop, RH ;
McEwen, SA ;
Meek, AH ;
Black, WD ;
Clarke, RC ;
Friendship, RM .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1998, 34 (04) :247-264