Effect of process parameters on the production and drying of Leuconostoc mesenteroides cultures

被引:17
作者
Champagne, CP [1 ]
Gardner, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, FRDC, St Hyacinthe, PQ J2S 8E3, Canada
关键词
starter; vegetable media; pH; aeration;
D O I
10.1038/sj/jim/7000245
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Leuconostoc mesenteroides BLAC was grown on MRS broth or on a carrot juice medium, and the effects of sugar concentration, type of pH control, aeration and fermentor size on viable counts were examined. The effect on viability of the type of centrifuge used to concentrate the bacterial culture was also examined. When the MRS broth had the traditional 110 mM glucose, pH control did not increase the final population. However, using a zone pH control mode, increasing the glucose content of MRS both from 110 to 220 mM almost doubled the population. In MRS broth, the amount of acetic acid produced was the same for all treatments, and was proportional to the amount of citrate consumed. There was a significantly lower cell yield in the carrot juice medium when the pH was not regulated. In the carrot juice medium, pH had a more pronounced effect on the final population level than did aeration, even though the quantity of viable cells was greater when the culture was aerated. In MRS broth, glucose was completely consumed during fermentation, but this was not the case in carrot juice medium. Aeration resulted in increased acetic acid content of the fermented medium. Viable counts were not affected by scaling the volume of the fermentation from 2 to 15 I,or by the type of centrifuge used to concentrate the cells. Cells were concentrated by a factor of 10, but in both centrifuge types, viable counts showed only an eightfold average increase. However, freeze-dried powders obtained from the continuous pilot-plant-centrifuged cultures had, on the average, 33% lower populations than those obtained from the laboratory unit.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 296
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Bergere J. -L., 1968, Lait, V48, P13, DOI 10.1051/lait:1968471-4722
  • [2] CONTROLLING CABBAGE FERMENTATIONS WITH NISIN AND NISIN-RESISTANT LEUCONOSTOC-MESENTEROIDES
    BREIDT, F
    CROWLEY, KA
    FLEMING, HP
    [J]. FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 12 (02) : 109 - 116
  • [3] COGAN T M, 1983, Irish Journal of Food Science and Technology, V7, P1
  • [4] CONDON S, 1983, Irish Journal of Food Science and Technology, V7, P15
  • [5] DEGUGLIELMONE GC, 1992, MICROBIOL ALIMENT NU, V10, P185
  • [6] DEMARION MCM, 1995, AUST J DAIRY TECHNOL, V50, P1
  • [7] DEMOSS RD, 1951, J BACTERIOL, V62, P400
  • [8] DESMAZEAUD M, 1994, BACTERIES LACTIQUES, V1, P200
  • [9] DEVOYOD JJ, 1988, LAIT, V68, P249, DOI 10.1051/lait:1988317
  • [10] Nutritional value of the non-protein N that accumulates during growth of proteinase-positive strains of Lactococcus lactis in milk for dairy lactococcal and leuconostoc isolates
    Foucaud, C
    Furlan, S
    Bellengier, P
    Juillard, V
    Richard, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 1998, 65 (03) : 491 - 501