Hubble expansion and structure formation in time varying vacuum models

We investigate the properties of the FLRW flat cosmological models in which the vacuum energy density evolves with time, Lambda(t). Using different versions of the Lambda(t) model, namely, quantum field vacuum, power series vacuum and power law vacuum, we find that the main cosmological functions such as the scale factor of the Universe, the Hubble expansion rate H, and the energy densities are defined analytically. Performing a joint likelihood analysis of the recent supernovae type Ia data, the cosmic microwave background shift parameter and the baryonic acoustic oscillations traced by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies, we put tight constraints on the main cosmological parameters of the Lambda(t) scenarios. Furthermore, we study the linear matter fluctuation field of the above vacuum models. We find that the patterns of the power series vacuum Lambda = n(1)H + n(2)H(2) predict stronger small scale dynamics, which implies a faster growth rate of perturbations with respect to the other two vacuum cases ( quantum field and power law), despite the fact that all the cosmological models share the same equation of state parameter. In the case of the quantum field vacuum Lambda = n(0) + n(2)H(2), the corresponding matter fluctuation field resembles that of the traditional Lambda cosmology. The power law vacuum (Lambda proportional to a(-n)) mimics the classical quintessence cosmology, the best fit being tilted in the phantom phase. In this framework, we compare the observed growth rate of clustering measured from the optical galaxies with those predicted by the current Lambda(t) models. Performing a Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test we show that the cosmological models which contain a constant vacuum (Lambda CDM), quantum field vacuum, and power law vacuum provide growth rates that match well with the observed growth rate. However, this is not the case for the power series vacuum models ( in particular, the frequently adduced Lambda proportional to H model) in which clusters form at significantly earlier times (z >= 4) with respect to all other models (z similar to 2). Finally, we derived the theoretically predicted dark matter halo mass function and the corresponding distribution of cluster-size halos for all the models studied. Their expected redshift distribution indicates that it will be difficult to distinguish the closely resembling models ( constant vacuum, quantum field, and power law vacuum), using realistic future x-ray surveys of cluster abundances. However, cluster surveys based on the Sunayev-Zeldovich detection method give some hope to distinguish the closely resembling models at high redshifts.