Amphotericin B nasal irrigation as an adjuvant therapy after functional endoscopic sinus surgery

被引:17
作者
Jiang, Rong-San [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hsu, Shuo-Hsiu [1 ]
Liang, Kai-Li [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Sch Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Med Univ, Fac Med, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
CILIARY BEAT FREQUENCY; CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS; ANTIFUNGAL TREATMENT; IN-VITRO; POLYPOSIS; FUNGAL; MUCOSA; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4246
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Fungus-driven inflammation is proposed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Previous studies evaluated the efficacy of intranasal amphotericin B (AMB) in the treatment of patients with CRS, but the results were controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 100 mu g/mL of AMB nasal irrigation as postoperative care after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Methods: Patients with CRS who received FESS for treatment were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups at 1 month after surgery. Patients in the AMB group received 100 mu g/mL of AMB nasal irrigation daily for 2 months, and those in the normal saline (NS) group received NS solution nasal irrigation daily for 2 months. Pre-FESS, pre-irrigation, and postirrigation sinonasal symptoms were assessed by questionnaires, and the patients received endoscopic examination, acoustic rhinometry, smell test, and saccharine transit test. Results: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled between June 2012 and December 2014. Among the patients who completed the study, 38 received AMB irrigation, and 39 received NS solution irrigation. Although all the patients reported improvement after irrigation, there was no difference in outcome between patients who received AMB and those who received NS solution. Conclusion: Our study showed that nasal irrigation with 100 mu g/mL of AMB did not confer a greater benefit than that of NS solution nasal irrigation in post-FESS care.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 440
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: Definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology [J].
Benninger, MS .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (03) :S1-S32
[2]   Extracts from The Cochrane Library:: Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis [J].
Burton, Martin J. ;
Eisenberg, Lee D. ;
Rosenfeld, Richard M. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 137 (04) :532-534
[3]  
Corradini C, 2006, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V16, P188
[4]   Amphotericin B nasal lavages: Not a solution for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis [J].
Ebbens, Fenna A. ;
Scadding, Glenis K. ;
Badia, Lydia ;
Hellings, Peter W. ;
Jorissen, Mark ;
Mullol, Joaquim ;
Cardesin, Alda ;
Bachert, Claus ;
van Zele, Thibaut P. J. ;
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. ;
Lund, Valerie ;
Fokkens, Wytske J. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 118 (05) :1149-1156
[5]   The mold conundrum in chronic hyperplastic sinusitis [J].
Ebbens, Fenna A. ;
Georgalas, Christos ;
Fokkens, Wytske J. .
CURRENT ALLERGY AND ASTHMA REPORTS, 2009, 9 (02) :114-120
[6]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[7]   Postoperative application of amphotericin B nasal spray in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, with a review of the antifungal therapy [J].
Gerlinger, I. ;
Fittler, A. ;
Fonai, F. ;
Patzko, A. ;
Mayer, A. ;
Botz, L. .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 266 (06) :847-855
[8]  
Gosepath J, 2002, AM J RHINOL, V16, P123
[9]   RETRACTED: Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (Retracted Article) [J].
Harvey, R. ;
Hannan, S. A. ;
Badia, L. ;
Scadding, G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (03)
[10]  
Hashemi SM, 2011, J RES MED SCI, V16, P74