European Surgical Education and Training in Gynecologic Oncology: The impact of an Accredited Fellowship

被引:7
作者
Chiva, Luis M. [1 ]
Minguez, Jose [1 ]
Querleu, Denis [2 ]
Cibula, David [3 ]
du Bois, Andreas [4 ]
机构
[1] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Pamplona, Spain
[2] Univ Toulouse, Toulouse, France
[3] Charles Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Kliniken Essen Mitte, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Essen, Germany
关键词
ESGO; Surgical training; Fellowship; Standardization; Accreditation; OVARIAN-CANCER PATIENTS; SURGERY; NETWORK; PERSPECTIVE; SURVIVAL; NEED;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000942
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to understand the current situation of surgical education and training in Europe among members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) and its impact on the daily surgical practice of those that have completed an accredited fellowship in gynecologic oncology. Methods A questionnaire addressing topics of interest in surgical training was designed and sent to ESGO members with surgical experience in gynecologic oncology. The survey was completely confidentially and could be completed in less than 5 minutes. Responses from 349 members from 42 European countries were obtained, which was 38% of the potential target population. The respondents were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had undergone an official accreditation process. Results Two thirds of respondents said they had received a good surgical education. However, accredited gynecologists felt that global surgical training was significantly better. Surgical self-confidence among accredited specialists was significantly higher regarding most surgical oncological procedures than it was among their peers without such accreditation. However, the rate of self-assurance in ultraradical operations, and bowel and urinary reconstruction was quite low in both groups. There was a general request for standardizing surgical education across the ESGO area. Respondents demanded further training in laparoscopy, ultraradical procedures, bowel and urinary reconstruction, and postoperative management of complications. Furthermore, they requested the creation of fellowship programs in places where they are not now accredited and the promotion of rotations and exchange in centers of excellence. Finally, respondents want supporting training in disadvantaged countries of the ESGO area. Conclusions Specialists in gynecologic oncology that have obtained a formal accreditation received a significantly better surgical education than those that have not. The ESGO responders recognize that their society should lead the standardization of surgical training and promote ways of improving members' surgical skills.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 825
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Surgical practice of UK gynaecological oncologists in the treatment of primary advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (PAEOC): A questionnaire survey [J].
Barton, D. P. J. ;
Adib, T. ;
Butler, J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) :347-351
[2]   Influence of the gynecologic oncologist on the survival of ovarian cancer patients [J].
Chan, John K. ;
Kapp, Daniel S. ;
Shin, Jacob Y. ;
Husain, Amreen ;
Teng, Nelson N. ;
Berek, Jonathan S. ;
Osann, Kathryn ;
Leiserowitz, Gary S. ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
O'Malley, Cynthia .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (06) :1342-1350
[3]   Current Clinical Practice in Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer A European Survey [J].
Cibula, David ;
Verheijen, Rene ;
Lopes, Alberto ;
Dusek, Ladislav .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (07) :1219-1224
[4]   Surgical education and training in gynecologic oncology I: European perspective [J].
Cibula, David ;
Kesic, Vesna .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) :S52-S55
[5]   Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: A systematic review [J].
du Bois, Andreas ;
Rochon, Justine ;
Pfisterer, Jacobus ;
Hoskins, William J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) :422-436
[6]   Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients [J].
Earle, CC ;
Schrag, D ;
Neville, BA ;
Yabroff, KR ;
Topor, M ;
Fahey, A ;
Trimble, EL ;
Bodurka, DC ;
Bristow, RE ;
Carney, M ;
Warren, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (03) :172-180
[7]   Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma [J].
Engelen, MJA ;
Kos, HE ;
Willemse, PHB ;
Aalders, JG ;
de Vries, EGE ;
Schaapveld, M ;
Otter, R ;
van der Zee, AGJ .
CANCER, 2006, 106 (03) :589-598
[8]   Laparoscopy training in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs [J].
Frumovitz, Michael ;
Soliman, Pamela T. ;
Greer, Marilyn ;
Schmeler, Kathleen M. ;
Moroney, John ;
Bodurka, Diane C. ;
Ramirez, Pedor T. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (02) :197-201
[9]   Who should operate on patients with ovarian cancer? An evidence-based review [J].
Giede, KC ;
Kieser, K ;
Dodge, J ;
Rosen, B .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 99 (02) :447-461
[10]   Surgical education: What role should gynecologic oncologists play? [J].
Goff, Barbara A. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 109 (02) :164-165