Seismic design and numerical assessment of shape memory alloy-restrained rocking precast concrete bridge columns

被引:11
作者
Akbarnezhad, Miles [1 ]
Salehi, Mohammad [1 ]
DesRoches, Reginald [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
accelerated bridge construction; rocking column; precast concrete; shape memory alloy; superelastic Nitinol; seismic design; finite element modeling; PLASTIC-DAMAGE MODEL; STEEL FRAMES; LIMIT STATES; SHAKE-TABLE; PERFORMANCE; PIERS; BEHAVIOR; TESTS; CONNECTION; BEARINGS;
D O I
10.1177/13694332221104276
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a class of shape memory alloy (SMA)-restrained rocking (SRR) bridge columns and numerically evaluates their response under lateral loading. SRR columns are low-damage precast concrete columns that are connected to their adjacent substructure components through two series of unbonded links, namely, SMA links and energy dissipation (ED) links. The SMA links, which are prestressed and made of superelastic Nitinol, provide the rocking joints with self-centering and dissipate a moderate amount of energy. The ED links, which are made of mild steel and are replaceable, supplement the hysteretic energy dissipation provided by the SMA links. The rocking joints are protected against concrete damage via steel jacketing and end steel plates. Following the introduction of three SRR column design variations, a displacement-based procedure is proposed for their effective seismic design. Nonlinear 3D finite element models are then developed to investigate the performance of the proposed columns under monotonic and cyclic lateral loading. Finally, a parametric study is conducted to examine the effective ranges of two major design parameters of SRR columns. The findings illustrate that the proposed SRR columns are capable of meeting their targeted performance objectives, i.e., avoiding damage under the displacement demands induced by a 2475-year seismic event, as well as providing significant self-centering and hysteretic damping.
引用
收藏
页码:2803 / 2829
页数:27
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]  
AASHTO, 2014, Guide Specifications for Seismic Isolation Design
[2]   Analytical and Finite-Element Modeling of FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns [J].
Abdelkarim, Omar I. ;
ElGawady, Mohamed A. .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (08)
[3]  
ACI, 2003, SPEC HYBR MOM FRAM C
[4]  
Aiken I.D., 1993, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V9, DOI [10.1193/1.1585720, DOI 10.1193/1.1585720]
[5]   Seismic Analysis of Precast Concrete Bridge Columns Connected with Grouted Splice Sleeve Connectors [J].
Ameli, M. J. ;
Pantelides, Chris P. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (02)
[6]   Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices [J].
Andrawes, B ;
DesRoches, R .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2005, 14 (03) :S60-S67
[7]   Sensitivity of seismic applications to different shape memory alloy models [J].
Andrawes, Bassem ;
DesRoches, Reginald .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2008, 134 (02) :173-183
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Abaqus documentation
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
[10]  
ASTM, 2014, ASTM A36/A36M